Thursday, November 29, 2007

Merry Tossmas

After watching this CitizenLink video: Merry Tossmas, I’ll admit. I laughed. I am also sympathetic to the sentiments expressed in this video. It makes me angry that some people are forbidden to wish me a “Merry Christmas.” To prohibit someone from saying “Merry Christmas” feels a lot like stepping onto a slope that prohibits free religious expression in this country. I believe that to the maximum extent possible we should allow the ringing of church bells, the wearing hijab, religious decorations, and other forms of religious expression.

BUT…I think there is a very big difference between being concerned when retailers prohibit the use of expressions such as “Merry Christams” and demanding that retailers call their winter marketing campaigns “Christmas” sales instead of “Holiday” sales. After all Christmas ISN’T a secular holiday and shopping really has nothing to do with it. Maybe I should prefer that retailers call it it “Holiday Shopping” so as not to confuse that with The Feast of the Nativity. Maybe those secular retailers know something that we should know. There isn’t any such thing as “Christmas Shopping.”

A thank you kindly to Christine at Domestic Vocation.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 17:04:38 | Permalink | Comments (3)

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Catholic Carnival #147: Giving, Not Receiving

Jay at Living Catholicism is hosting this week’s Catholic Carnival: Giving, Not Receiving. It is a wonderful collection of posts presented to help us bridge this time between Thanksgiving and Advent. Please support Catholic blogging on the internet. Bloggers usually live for some encouraging comments. Read, comment, and enjoy!

If you’d like to contribute to or host a future Catholic Carnival, you can read about it here.

And if you have a few minutes, take some time to stop by the Blogger’s Choice 2008 awards and vote for some of your favorite Catholic blogs.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:59 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Blesseds John Sugar (Suker) and Robert Grissold († 1604)

Although in his earlier years John Sugar, of Wombourne, England, embraced Protestantism, becoming a Protestant minister, he tok exception to the Protstant monarchy’s anti-papal oath of supremacy. Ultimately John became a Catholic, journeying to the continent after his conversion to study for the priesthood. Following his ordination in 1601, Father Sugar returned to his native region of west central England to begin his priestly ministry there. In July 1603, he was captured together with a farmhand assisting him, Robert Grissold, a native of Rowington. The two were held in prison for a year before being sentenced. Father Sugar was condemned to be drawn and quartered for being a priest. Robert was condemned to be hung for refusing to attend a Protestant church service and for helping Father Sugar. Both were put to death on July 16, 1604.
Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:40 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Advice to Blessed Mother Teresa

Put your hand in His — in His hand — and walk all the way with Him.

         ~~Advice to Blessed Mother Teresa from her mother.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 23:13:58 | Permalink | No Comments »

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Cardinal DiNardo

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 16:46:50 | Permalink | No Comments »

Friday, November 23, 2007

Tomorrow is the Big Day for Cardinal Designate DiNardo

The Houston Chronicle has a newswatch blog up to follow the elevation of Archbishop Dinardo to Cardinal on Saturday.  There are some wonderful pictures and this one is a favorite.

 
Posted by Red Neck Woman at 22:30:00 | Permalink | No Comments »

Apostolic Tessellation

Originally Posted on that Protestant homescooling forum:
I saw your outline, but I really would love scripture. Where does it say in the Bible that the apostleship of Peter was passed down directly throughout the ages. Scripture in context. No one in the Catholic Church has done this for me (and I have many friends in the RCC, I might add) I went to school with them. lol.

Why? I don’t mean that question to sound snarky. Let me explain my perspective. The first time my children do a task they get lots of instruction. The second time less so. The third time even less and so forth. At some point in the learning process, I get to hit the high points and move on to better things. At some point, I get to assume that we have verbs nailed and we can move onto other more complex grammatical structures. Does that mean verbs aren’t important? NO! It means, that I have already said it and demonstrated it so many times that I am going to assume that if they don’t know that part they can brush up and move onto the rest. If someone were to look at written instructions I leave for my children regarding their grammar and didn’t take into account previous instruction on verbs, one might assume that I didn’t believe that verbs were important anymore.

Or put another way. I am certainly not a mathematician but with issues such as this it helps me to view scripture as a tessellation or even more complex than that more like a simple fractal. A growing polynomial that with each new iteration reveals a clearer view of the overall but at its core remains the same. Each repetition of the pattern locks things more completely into place. Each step is built on the last and together they all click into place and provide a revealing picture. Once the pattern is established, it is only necessary to clearly delineate changes from it.

God’s pattern of authority starts with the husband and father of a family. We see this early in Genesis when God says to Eve “yet your urge shall be for your husband and he shall be your master.” (Genesis 3:16b NAB) As I outlined in my previous post, this pattern repeats it is reiterated within the family and used to establish authority within the Jewish faith and in Israel. God chooses the first leader(s) and then that leadership is passed on through them. That is the scriptural context. If Jesus meant to do something different; then, I would expect that to be clearly spelled out. If He meant, that authority in His Church would be passed along in a way similar to what was already established in scripture and culture, I would expect there to be minimal instruction. So when in Matthew 16:13-19 Jesus says “And so I say to you, you are Peter [Rock], and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” I see this as a commissioning of leadership in a manner similar to Aaron, Elijah, and David…the expectation is that leadership will continue from Peter. Time and again we see in the NT, that Peter is the chief apostle. (And I am cheating here with an apologetic list, I can come up with many of these on my own but I would not be able to be quite so thorough on my own.) Jesus tells Peter that his faith my strengthen his brethren (Luke 22:32), is given charge of feeding Jesus’ sheep (John 21:17); Jesus’ resurrection was announced to Peter by an angel (Mark 16:7); headed the meeting which elected Matthias (Acts 1:13-26); led the Apostles in preaching on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:14); received first coverts (Acts 2:41); performed first miracle after Pentecost (Acts 3:6-7); inflicted first Church punishment (Acts 5:1-11); excommunicated the first heretic (Acts 8:21); received revelation to admit Gentiles into church; (Acts 10:44-46); led first council in Jerusalem (Acts 15:7); pronounces first dogmatic decision (Acts 15:19); Paul visits chief Apostle after conversion (Gal 1:18); etc…. Early church history confirms the legacy of a chief apostle, the writing of the early church father line up with the pattern established in scripture.

That’s the pattern as I see it. Apostolic succession fits the tessellation/fractal of scripture and that is further supported by early church history and the writings of the early church fathers. If the equation needed to be altered, then that would have needed clear and detailed instructions. There aren’t clear scriptures spelling it out because they aren’t necessary. Spiritual succession with a named leader and then proceeding from him is what would be expected given the pattern of all previous scripture. The burden of proof therefore, must rest on the contrary assumption.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:00 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Catholic Carnival #146

If you take the time to visit the Catholic Carnival every week, you can’t help but gain a deep appreciation for the various expressions of personality by each host. This week’s host, Domini Sumus, has defnitely excelled in presenting personality and humor along with this weeks selection of the best of Catholic blogging.

And while you are at it, go vote for some of your favorite Catholic Bloggers at the Blogger’s Choice Awards 2008. (btw….if you voted before, you’ll need to vote again because it’s a new year!)

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 00:22:19 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Shameless Plug: Vote For Postscripts From the Catholic Spitfire Grill

My site was nominated for Best Religion Blog!
Drop by the Blogger’s Choice Awards and vote for your favorites.
You can vote for as many as you like, so maybe you could throw me a bone and vote for mine too.

SmileyCentral.com

Just in case you need a link to EXACTLY where you can vote for my blog, click here.

SmileyCentral.com
Posted by Red Neck Woman at 01:58:13 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Tell me how I can know for sure that when I die I will go to Heaven.

Quote:
Ok so do me a favor. Tell me how I can know for sure that when I die I will go to Heaven.

Ok…I don’t want you to take this the wrong way. I am not avoiding your question but rather I am trying to direct your attention to something I consider MORE important than the “reward.” It isn’t that I am avoiding your question, it is that I don’t think your question is important. Not in the  I-think-you-are-refuse-tossed-upon-the-shore-and-the-vermin-are-going-to-get-you-so-why-should-I-bother kind of unimportant but rather in the sense of gently trying to redirect your attention to a different way of looking at things.

I don’t care if I am going to heaven. Ok…that’s not entirely true. I do care. But it just doesn’t matter any more. Jesus has FREED ME. He paid the price and I know that so I can stop worrying. I am a filthy rotten sinner and he loves me enough to let me know that. He gripped me in His Grace and I grabbed back. I hung on. All the while I am looking in His eyes and He is telling me how much He loves me. I look at the cross and to his victory and I say “Thank you!! I didn’t deserve that.” But then I say, “Now what?” Will you help me to serve you? I know I can never be worth that, but will you help me try anyway? All the while He shows me me where my sinful scars remain and the places that need cleaning still. He shows me the people He loves and asks me to feed them. To hold their hands. To cry with them. He says….”Will you be my hands? My feet?” And I say, “I’m not worthy. I am sure I won’t do it right, but I’ll try. Will you help me?” And He does.

No. I am not going to heaven when I die. I AM IN HEAVEN NOW! It may not feel like it. I may not see it. But I trust Him. He took care of the details. In the meantime, I keep my eyes fixed on Him and try (As He enables) to “Do whatever He tells me.” to stand before Him in prayer and say “I am the handmaid of the Lord, let it be done to me according to thy word.” I don’t pray to get to heaven. I am already there. I don’t go to Mass to get to heaven. I go Mass to worship alongside the angels. The Sacraments He gave me, pull me closer still. They draw me closer and daily reduce the desire for this “living sacrifice” to jump off the altar or avoid the knife. As I am drawn further still into heaven, as the old self continues to burn away I am ever less likely to turn around and pick up the familiar ways of the dead self. And in THAT sense, these things “save” me. Not because they substitute for the price HE paid but rather that they help me to kill that part of me that would drag me back and away.

So what do I say to you who so badly want to get to heaven? Why aren’t you already there? He paid the price so that now your life can be either a journey closer to Him or not…and the price He paid makes the living matter. Live the life He has made possible and stop worrying about the reward at the journey’s end. Are you as close to heaven on earth as you should be? Are you living the faith as He set out in scripture? Because Jason, in my opinion, it is more about life than death.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:00 | Permalink | No Comments »