Thursday, January 29, 2009

On Being Sensible…

I’m tired of being sensible. It seems to me that being Christian is a call to a life lived outside of the boundaries that society labels “sensible.” I am tired of being kept from doing what I know to be the kind and Christian thing to do by stories of mayhem and murder. I am sick and tired of my “inner censor” telling me that I should not give some money for lunch to the disreputable person because he/she might spend it on [fill in the undesirable substance which might be purchased].

So today as I was heading to the eye doctor’s to pick up the jacket left behind by my children a couple of days ago (mutter sputter), I passed a man walking with a duffel bag on his back in the brutal cold. (It was 47 degrees here and in Houston that is brutal. You may stop guffawing now if you live where 47 degrees is a winter heat wave.) He was clearly down on his luck and I said a quick prayer for him as I went in the opposite direction that he was walking. But on the way home, he was walking in the same direction I was driving and I was just overcome with wanting to help. Now, I know it is not the sensible thing to do to pick up a stranger, but I didn’t have my children with me so I decided that I was risking only myself. I also ignored the very sensible voice of my best friend on the phone who said “You are going to do WHAT!? You had better CALL me when you drop him off” Good. Not sensible but I’ve got someone in the background waiting to call the cavalary if I don’t turn up…that’s prudent. I made a u-turn and offered to help.He was headed to “Nawlins.”  Well now, “Nawlins” wasn’t on my list of places to visit but I did offer to take him the 30 or so miles to I-10 where he was more likely to find somebody who was headed that way. I dropped him off with money for some meals and he walked off in the direction of Nawlins and I picked up my cell phone and assured my best friend of my safety. It wasn’t convenient. It wasn’t sensible. But it was the right thing to do nonetheless.

When I got home, I sat down to do today’s Mass readings with the children. And today’s gospel added precisely the right grace notes to my morning.

Mark 4:21-25 Jesus said to his disciples, “Is a lamp brought in to be placed under a bushel basket or under a bed, and not to be placed on a lampstand? For there is nothing hidden except to be made visible; nothing is secret except to come to light. Anyone who has ears to hear ought to hear.” He also told them, “Take care what you hear. The measure with which you measure will be measured out to you, and still more will be given to you. To the one who has, more will be given; from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away.

Is there anything even remotely sensible about the Grace we are given from God? How many times do we squander the gifts we are given? And how many times have we hurt our Lord by rejecting Him? Sensible indeed. If He can be vulnerable, and risk having His previous gifts to us squandered and rejected, how much more should we be ridiculous for His sake?

And so almost a month into this new year, I find myself with a resolution to be less sensible. I have to say that in spite of the way the car smelled after this gentleman’s exit from my car, it was worth it.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 21:37:53 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, November 30, 2008

No Such Thing as Christmas Shopping

This is the time of year when we hear much in the news about how retailers refuse to say “Merry Christmas” and have “Holiday Sales” instead of “Christmas Sales.” I’ve also heard that we should do things to remind retailers that if they do not say “Merry Christmas” we will buy our Christmas presents elsewhere.


Well I am not so sure. Perhaps the secular retailers are reminding those of us who are anxious to celebrate the birth of Jesus that there is no such thing as “Christmas” shopping. Perhaps those retailers noticed that sometimes churches don’t even have services on Christmas. On that Protestant forum I hang out on, there have even been threads about whether or not a church should have a Christmas service. “Too inconvenient” was a common response.  ”Christmas is about spending time with our families” was another. Feel free to pick up some rocks and hurl them at me, but shouldn’t Christmas be FIRST about spending time celebrating the Incarnation?  Sure it’s a good time to celebrate family in memory of the Holy Family but not instead of taking time to worship. Yes it’s a good time to give gifts to others in honor of the Gift of the Incarnation but that’s not the way we worship God. We might shop during the Christmas season, but I’m not sure it’s Christmas shopping we’re doing. If we want to really do the kind of shopping that honors Our Lord, why not shop at Heifer.org or Kiva and give to those who are truly in need? Nobody “needs” a new iPod, or Wii, or XBox not even our precious children. Perhaps in the end what we are doing in those retail stores when we are getting the latest stuff really is only “Holiday” shopping and we ought to recognize that part of our winter holidays for what it really is.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 22:28:39 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

On Voting Your “Conscience”

I have truly wanted to avoid making political statements on my blog. Partly because I am so disgusted by the whole political scene this election cycle that my blood pressure simply cannot take paying close enough attention to have an opinion informed enough to blog on it. Although lest anyone take me to task for failing in my citizenly duty, I have formed an opinion of sufficient depth to cast an educated vote. However, I heard it said once too often in very recent days, that someone was “going to vote their conscience” meaning they were going to vote third party rather than for one of the two men who will be our next president. (God help us.)

Let me be clear. I do not support either major candidate for the presidency. I have disliked McCain and his politics for as long as I can remember. I have disliked Obama and his politics for not quite as long. Nevertheless, I cannot cast my vote for someone who is campaiging on a promise to pass legislation that will surely increase the number of abortions in this country. I am not a one issue voter, but Obama’s absolutely uncompromising stance on abortion including voting against protecting babies born alive, and partial birth abortions, etc. totally disqualifies him for dog catcher much less POTUS.

But I digess. Back to voting third party. Unless a third party candidate is on the ballot in enough states to win an electoral majority and ideally in all 50 states (and yes, I know how hard that is to accopmlish for a third party candidate) they are simply not only not going to win. Furthermore, they are not prepared to govern if they do win.

The Constitution Party candidate (the one I have heard most often as the favored third party choice…although, he is not my particular temptation in the third party realm), Chuck Baldwin, is currently on the ballot (not as a write-in) in states constituting 318 electoral votes. That leaves 220 electoral votes that he absolutely cannot get. You need 270 to win.

So to be clear here, all Obama and McCain have to do TOGETHER is get 48 electoral votes in the states where Baldwin is on the ballot and he cannot win. Can’t. You think that Obama isn’t going to take 55 electoral votes in California? Or that Texas (34 electoral votes) isn’t going to McCain? That’s the reality.

And let’s just suspend reality for a minute and ask, “How is a third party candidate, that doesn’t even have the depth of support to get on the ballot in all 50 states going to govern in the event he actually got elected?” The whole idea of accumulating and spending “political capital” is a very real one and a third party candidate wouldn’t have ANY to start with.

I think that third party candidates for President help foster the notion that the most important vote we make is the one for President and that the only way we have to influence politics is with our vote. Meadow muffins. We’ve got a lot of options available to us. We can build a new party by doing the hard work necessary to get local people on the ballot and building from there, NOT by starting at the top and working down. We can have fund-raisers and talk to our neighbors for the the entire 4 years between presidential elections so that there is a base to build from. We can support the special interests that we care the most about with our hard earned money. We can write those people we do elect and send letters to the editor and hold our elected officials accountable ALL of the time and not just the 6 months before a presidential election.

It’s not our presidential vote that we “throw away.” It’s all the time between elections that is thrown away when we could have been working and investing some of our OWN political capital so that we aren’t faced with a choice of the lesser of two evils. If we are faced with a choice of the lesser of two evils, I don’t think that voting thrid party is the way to assuage our conscience. It’s how we use our time and money between elections that will truly fix our conscience.

I’m guilty too.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 20:17:43 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Don’t Let Your Left Hand Know What Your Right Hand Is Doing

Matthew 6:1-4 (But) take care not to perform righteous deeds in order that people may see them; otherwise, you will have no recompense from your heavenly Father. When you give alms, do not blow a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets to win the praise of others. Amen, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right is doing, so that your almsgiving may be secret. And your Father who sees in secret will repay you.

Something I’ve learned is that trying to do good and not get caught doesn’t just act to kill vanity and pride, it is also like fertilizer for the virtue of charity. As I attempt to conceal the good that I do, it becomes easier to assume the same in others. Or at least give them the benefit of the doubt. 

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 03:29:38 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Monday, July 28, 2008

Something Needs to Be Said…

Do you ever talk back to the TV? My husband tells me that this is an effective means of communication and that the football players and referees will alter their actions because he has told them what to do. He has told me this frequently through our married life and I am certain that he would not lie to me. I am hoping that blogging is a similarly effective form of communication because I went to mass this morning at the Co-Cathedral of the Sacred Heart and this must be said.

This…..

….is a baptismal font.

You will see something similar to it in every Catholic Church every place on the planet. They come in many different sizes and shapes and depending on when the church was built it might be at the front of the church or at the door as you walk in. Even if it is big and looks like it might sort of be like a fountain, it is not. It is a baptismal font. You may dip your fingers in the water and bless yourself with it, if you would like. Even if you are not Catholic. Really. Everyone is welcome to bless themselves with the water. It is not, however, a wishing well. Please do not throw money into it.

Thank you. I feel better now.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 01:26:42 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Friday, July 25, 2008

Battleplans

I am up to my eyeballs in planning for the upcoming school year.  I use Edu-Track to make lesson plans, keep track of materials we’ve used, field trips we’ve been on, books we’ve read etc. I can print out lesson plans, report cards, transcripts, and all kinds of reports. This program is truly been worth at least ten times the price I paid in the amount of work it has saved me. But…it’s a little like Quicken. You’ve got to put the data in the program in the first place in order to reap the benefits. And so I sit with piles of books and notebooks, typing up my lesson plans for the year. It’s tedious but since it doesn’t require a great deal of mental effort my mind is free to wander.

Over the years, the thoughts that go through my head have varied. At the beginning of my homeschooling journey, I used paper and pencil and could do this job in a few hours over each weekend. Gradually at I added more children to the school roster and as they advanced in “wisdom and stature” [snort] the job became more complex and I added software to help me with the task. Those years were marked by a sense of optimism. I couldn’t wait to share with my children all of these exciting learning opportunities. I loved grammar (can’t proofread for beans though in case you were wondering where the evidence of that love is)…why shouldn’t they love it too!? So of course, a langauge arts program that includes learning how to diagram sentences would be fun for us all. Latin? Of course! A daily nature journal? What a way to get out into God’s Creation and learn to love it! I won’t bore you with the laundry list but the evidence of my optimism is still all there on my schoolroom shelves. The optimism of those earlier years has been replaced by a sense of reality. The reality is that my children have long regarded anything involving actually writing on paper to be something akin to a form of medieval torture. The sentence diagramming thing? It’s gathering dust. Somehow the children that God gave me don’t appreciate the beauty or the importance of grammar. Latin? Well there wasn’t room for the second langauge they needed (Spanish) and that third language I wanted them to have (Latin). My visions of well scrubbed, happy, polite, obedient children enthusiastically participating in the formation of their minds has been replaced with reality. They’re grumpy in the morning. For that matter, they are grumpy right up to the point where I say that we’ve done enough school for the day. They still have trouble correctly identifying whether the dishes are clean in the dishwasher and responding appropriately. I still can’t see to make them understand the wearing of clean clothes is an important life skill. They CRY if they have to write anything more than a few sentences. In short, I have to push and cajole and persuade and bribe and pester and nag and….

Just like God has to do to me? To get me to join in all that He has for me?

SHHHH…..I didn’t hear that Lord, I was busy telling you about how my children make me work SO hard to get them to do these wonderful things. Would you please not interrupt me with a “teachable moment” about my own faults?

And so I leave you with the first immutable rule of homeschooling….

No battleplan survives contact with the enemy.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 15:50:14 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, July 14, 2008

Some Things That Are Wrong….

It’s wrong to defend the Faith with violence and/or threats of violence. Period.

These people and people like them….and here should not be getting ugly emails much less death threats or threats of any kind. Yes. What has been said and done is unspeakably ugly and disrespectful. Blasphemous. So?

As Christians we are commanded to love those who ridicule us and revile us. Period.

Sure. We can storm eBay and ask that they not allow the sale of consecrated items. We can make known the depth of outrage caused by such desecration. We can take reasonable precautions to prevent additional acts of desecration, but we have to LOVE the people that mock us and our Faith. That means no death threats. No violence. No ugly words. Not just because these things are counter-productive, but because they are wrong.

If you need a weapon, drop to your knees and fast and pray. Offer reparation on their behalf.

Here’s one to get you started…..

Act of Reparation

O Sacred Heart of Jesus, animated with a desire to repair the outrages unceasingly offered to Thee, we prostrate before Thy throne of mercy, and in the name of all mankind, pledge our love and fidelity to Thee!

The more Thy Mysteries are blasphemed, the more firmly we shall believe them, O Sacred Heart of Jesus!

The more impiety endeavors to extinguish our hopes of immortality, the more we shall trust in Thy Heart, sole hope of mankind!

The more hearts resist Thy Divine attractions, the more we shall love Thee, O infinitely amiable Heart of Jesus.

The more unbelief attacks Thy Divinity, the more humbly and profoundly we shall adore It, O Divine Heart of Jesus!

The more Thy holy laws are transgressed and ignored, the more we shall delight to observe them, O most holy Heart of Jesus!

The more Thy Sacraments are despised and abandoned, the more frequently we shall receive them with love and reverence, O most liberal Heart of Jesus!

The more the imitation of Thy virtues is neglected and forgotten, the more we shall endeavor to practice them, O Heart, model of every virtue!

The more the devil labors to destroy souls, the more we shall be inflamed with desire to save them, O Heart of Jesus, zealous Lover of souls!

The more sin and impurity destroy the image of God in man, the more we shall try by purity of life to be a living temple of the holy Spirit, O Heart of Jesus!

The more Thy Holy Church is despised, the more we shall endeavor to be her faithful children, O Sweet Heart of Jesus!

The more Thy Vicar on earth is persecuted, the more will we honor him as the infallible head of Thy Holy Church, show our fidelity and pray for him, O Kingly Heart of Jesus!

O Sacred Heart, through Thy powerful grace, may we become Thy apostles in the midst of a corrupted world, and be Thy crown in the kingdom of heaven. Amen.

Besides….bad manners speak for themselves.

Yes. I know this was much worse than just bad manners but at the very least it was terribly bad manners and on that most reasonable people could agree.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 04:26:36 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, March 30, 2008

Why Catholics Don’t Discuss Their Faith With “You”

On the Protestant homeschool forum I hang out on I often hear about Catholics who are just “going through the motions.” Now I am not living with any kind of delusion that all Catholics have a deep and vibrant faith and there aren’t those who are indeed “going through the motions” but there are some things that make “us” reticent to be open about our faith. My best friend who was a Southern Baptist before she became Catholic said to me once, “I never understood why we never talked about our faith. Now I get it.” The following is the explanation I provided on the forum….

I can’t crawl inside your life and know about the specific Catholics you are referring to that are going through the motions. Maybe they ARE going through the motions. It’s certainly possible. But as someone on the “inside” there are some things I think should be taken into account. I am on our Church’s RCIA (RCIA classes are the classes taken by those coming into the Catholic Church or my Catholics who just want to know more about their faith) team and I do hear from other Catholics on the Sonlight forums that avoid LLL like the plague. I often run across Catholics who freely and openly admit to me (because I am “safe”) that they happily play dumb for any non-Catholic Christian/Protestant who asks them about their faith. Yep. You heard me right. They actively avoid talking about their faith with non-Catholic Christians/Protestants. So let me tell you a little bit about what I see from this side of the Tiber.

I am NOT saying that all non-Catholic Christians/Protestants are like this but I will tell you that in the vast majority of cases, the only reason I get questioned about my faith is so that the other person can cultivate the opportunity to fix it. I wish I could say that these sorts of things were uncommon but they aren’t. At least half of those in my RCIA class have family who are apoplectic about their conversion. I see it all the time in the Spitfire Grill as well. Those who convert lose friends and family. They are subjected to email campaigns from church members and intrusive home visits demanding an “explanation.” One member of the Spitfire Grill was told by her pastor that their joining the Catholic Church amounted to an unforgiveable sin and they would NEVER be able to repent. I live in an area that was severely affected by a recent natural disaster. We took in many refugees from the hardest hit areas in our area. Our church does not have the facilities to actually provide shelter (by law….we’d be willing to try and make it work but the Federal government won’t allow it). So instead of providing shelter, our church worked to provide supplies to other shelters. Our church took a pick-up load of supplies to a local church (not a small one) for them to distribute. The people that were about to unload the supplies asked where they came from. When they discovered they were from the local Catholic Church, they refused to take them. This church also refused to allow a Catholic clergyman from our parish to minister to those sheltering in their church….even though given the demographics of the population it is likely that there were Catholics in there. On this very thread we heard how a family member got angry and said that the Catholic Church didn’t believe in the resurrection. My children have been told that they worship candles. Many homeschool groups are closed to Catholics. And then there are oodles of websites and organizations dedicated to saving Catholics from eternal damnation. (Google “Whore of Babylon” and see what comes up.) Time and again when I am teaching in RCIA, I hear from the students “You should hear what my [relative] says about THAT! She/he thinks I am going to hell and told me so too.”

I wish I could say that these were isolated incidents but they are not. I’ve had things like this said to my face and behind my back. My children are openly viewed as a mission field by their non-Catholic/Protestant friends. I hear it from those converting to the Catholic Church across the country. Ask at your local homeschooling convention if they allow Catholic speakers or vendors. Ask for a Catholic book at many Christian bookstores. I’ve seen what has been said to high-profile converts such as Beckwith, Cathy Duffy, and the Donut Man. This is what Catholics hear from non-Catholic Christians/Protestants all of the time. Of course, it’s not ALL of the time but it’s often enough so that when most Catholic are questioned about their faith they see the questioner like this

and feel like this:

Of course some of us are just wearing feathers, doing our best bird impression, and chanting “Here kitty, kitty….”  but I digress….

Now besides feeling like the conversation is nothing but a set-up for converting you from the clutches of Rome, there is the sheer magnitude of what you’ve got to know to be ready for even the most basic challenges to your faith.

Consider what the implications are for unity in the Catholic Church. When was the last time you had to answer for the Salem Witch Trials? Probably never or certainly not regularly. After all, that was THEM and not your church. But when you are Catholic and you are ONE with those who came before you, you are answerable for the Crusades, and the Inquisition, and selling indulgences. Think about this, all the questioner has to do is come up with a few facts (often wrong) about these events and then sit back and say “well what about that? What about the Crusades…huh?”

How are YOU on Crusade history? Good enough to spot erroneous information? Can you name them all? Put them in historical context? Sort the good from the bad? Provide proof? On the spur of the moment? Can you do that for the Inquisition? The Reformation in Europe? In England? Offer support or context for the accusations made against the Church in South America? Galileo? The task is really quite daunting and the burden of proof is always placed on the Catholic.

Then there are those who go to website like this pick up a few quotes from encyclicals that they’ve never read and demand that we defend them. When was the last time you were called to account for a letter your pastor wrote 25 years ago? How about 250 years ago? Do you have all those letters? Read them all? Can you place them all in historical context? Can you explain the purpose for them being written? What was it in response to? Can you explain the changes in language and practice that relate to appropriately interpreting the meaning of those letters?

Or they learn what the Catholic Church teaches from websites like this and then the Catholic must first correct the incorrect statements of Catholic belief or complete those that are partially stated with official church documents. Only to have the questioner walk away and declare that they talked to a Catholic for [x] length of time and they never used the BIBLE! Maybe they’ll even say it to our face. If they say to us that their church strives to be just like the Church of Acts, and we say but we have writings from the early church and they would disagree here, here, and here then we get the same accusation.

Then there is the questioner who has spent the entire conversation hammering away at the “You worship statues and dead people/Mary worship” lines, only to walk away and announce that Catholics never talk about their relationship with Jesus!!

When the Pope fails to stop people in the Philppines from crucifying themselves, he is not strict enough. But let them declare that marriage is permanent and that remarried Catholics must abstain from Eucharist and he is outrageously out of line.

As a Catholic, you end up defending every crazy thing that someone’s aunt’s cousin’s priest said or did. You get to defend your faith from accusations made by people who say they were a priest (or nun or whatever) but were not. If you use the Catechism to show that the priest was wrong or out-of-line, then you get accused of not using the Bible. If you manage to balance the Bible and the Catechism sufficiently to make your point; then, you are the exceptional Catholic and they still believe all of the rest of them are wrong or “going through the motions.”

Now please let me be clear, I am NOT offended by the questions you’ve asked. I believe that if I am going to claim a different sort of unity exists in the Catholic faith, then I am going to have to take the good with the bad. That means I get to talk about the Inquisition and the Crusades….although I am not particularly knowledgable about either. I believe that if I am going to claim that Jesus is really and truly present in the Eucharist and that it makes a difference, my non-Catholic Christian/Protestant brothers and sisters in faith can justifiably hold me to a higher standard. If I am going to claim papal infallibiblity, then by golly I am going to have to answer for 500 year old encyclicals so that means I need to own them and read them. And the Dogmatic Constitutions, and their source documents, and the early church fathers etc.

I am only trying to illustrate that:

1. Catholics by and large have learned that Protestants/non-Catholic Christians want to hear about our faith for only one reason. It happens often enough that you enter such conversations with a great deal of caution.

2. Once you engage in the conversation, you can find yourself in WAY over your head even if you know the FAITH….simply because so many other issues are regularly the topic of conversation. And if you answer one question, the questioner immediately moves to the next accusation.

And that’s why you may find that even the devoutly practicing Catholics that you know may be reluctant to open up about Jesus. If you want to hear what they really think, I would suggest asking in such a way that demonstrates good faith. (Not saying that you wouldn’t be asking in good faith otherwise….only that it might be necessary to break through some previous bad experiences) If you want to hear about their relationship with Jesus, ask if you can go with them to Mass. Take them out to eat afterwards and ask them about the symbolism. Why did they do this? What did that mean? They may not be able to answer it all, but I suspect they they will be more open about their faith under such circumstances.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 19:56:06 | Permalink | Comments (17)

Monday, February 25, 2008

A Disciple With Flowers

A couple of years ago I read a very interesting book about the Shroud of Turin ,  (The Shroud of Turin: The Illustrated Evidence by Ian Wilson and Barrie Schwortz…..unfortunately it is out of print and usually not inexpensive on the used book market because it has been mentioned prominently by other major authors like Robin Cook.)

Now if it turns out that the Shroud of Turin has nothing to do with  Jesus, my world is not going to be shattered. But after reading this book, I am convinced that it is more probable that the shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus than not. I think of it as the burial cloth of Jesus. In any case, because the image is of a beaten and crucified man and I cannot see the shroud and not think of Jesus. So I purchased a high quality print of the shroud and hung it on the wall at the foot of my bed.

Obviously, it easily calls to mind the very high price that was paid for my redemption by Our Lord. But it is a detail that I learned of the image on the shroud from The Shroud of Turin, that got me the most teary when I read the book. The image on the Shroud of Turin bears the distinct imprint of flowers. It had just never occurred to me that those disciples that took charge of His Body and His burial, would have included flowers with the linen, and spices, and aloes. I would love to have heard Jesus on the hillside for the Sermon on the Mount. I would love to have been present at the Wedding at Cana. There are any number of events miracles in the Gospels that I would love to have been present for, but most of all I think, I would like to have been among the disciples that brought Him flowers on that day.

I can’t take back the sins that made it necessary for Him to die. I just want to bring Him flowers, to let Him know how sorry I am and to say “Thank you.”

Have you brought Jesus flowers today?

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 23:35:06 | Permalink | Comments (6)

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Things I am Learning From St. Catherine of Siena

The daily catechism time I have with my children usually consists of prayer, scripture (the day’s Mass readings), and a read-aloud time from something religious….most often a biography of a saint. Currently we are reading from Lay Seige to Heaven: A Novel About St. Catherine of Siena by Loius deWohl. These biographies are an exceptionally good way of teaching my children about the faith. I know this because I learn so much about the faith. I think it was Benedict XVI who said that the best interpretation of scripture is to be found in the lives of the Saints. If it wasn’t the Holy Father that said it, it must have been someone else really smart because….well I agree with it so much. Anyway back to the learning part.

Too many times I think that we think we are being holy when we can pick up our fingers, point them,  and accurately discern the sin that our neighbor has committed….did you notice how I dragged you right into this?….all right….Let me re-phrase that. Too many times, I think I am being holy when I can accurately discern sin in someone else’s life. It’s so darn easy isn’t it? They are too focused on money or they gossip or lust or are ungenerous with their time or their money. But in the end, most of the time they know they are sinning and quite frankly don’t need hypocritical me stepping in to do the Holy Spirit’s job. And in the end, my helpfully pointing out where the poor sinner needs to straighten up usually just ends in ME being accused of being judgmental…can you imagine? Truthfully, I don’t go around pointing such things out but I do stuggle with the temptation to do so from time to time. But perhaps it is because I am so easily tempted to uncharitableness and judgementalism that I was so struck by St. Catherine of Siena. Here was a woman who was so intensely devoted to Our Lord and so deeply committed to rooting out all worldliness in her life that she simply radiated the Holy Spirit. Apparently she inspired people to abandon their sinful lives by get this….just being holy. She didn’t walk into a room and tell a priest that he was violating his vow of poverty by the richness of his possessions. She didn’t stand on a street corner, point her finger, and tell the notorious libertine that he should leave his married mistress. No. She just sat and listened or watched or prayed (silently) and the next thing  you know these people were making a beeline for the confessional, selling their possessions and giving them to the poor, and abandoning their worldly ways. Not because she said a word about it to them but because she gave herself completely to Our Lord and trusted the Holy Spirit in her to speak to those around her instead of opening her mouth herself.

It’s easy to convince ourselves….oh all right….I don’t have a hard time convincing myself that I have an obligation to “tell” someone who is in sin the error of his/her ways and indeed there are probably times when we are called to speak up. But that’s the easy way out I think and most of the time it should be our prayer and our personal holiness that allows the Holy Spirit to work through us wordlessly that should be doing the “talking.” It is certainly at the heart of what St. Francis of Assisi meant when he said, “Preach always. If necessary, use words.” and in the example of St. Catherine of Siena.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 03:07:22 | Permalink | Comments (3)