Sunday, January 4, 2009

Thank You!! You’ve Funded a Kiva Loan

I while back I told you all about a book to help with teaching your children about the week’s Gospel readings. (If you missed that post, you can read it here.) In my post I mentioned that I would receive a small amount of any sales generated through my blog and I also mentioned that I planned to give that money to Kiva. Well, I didn’t really expect to have to follow through but apparently some of you actually ordered (Thank you.) and I have received enough money (plus a little extra) to fund a loan. Meet the Nelva Mery Nipa Pelaez Group I will use the extra as a donation to Kiva.

Which leads me to an update to my review. Those of you who have purchased Hear My Voice will want to know that their website now has a link where you can download coloring pages for the current week’s Gospel readings!! So click your heels together and say “I want to use printer ink like water. I want to use printer ink like water” and click below.
Download a children's coloring page for this week's Mass Gospel Reading

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 03:02:48 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Hear My Voice: A Children’s Translations of Gospel Readings

Attention primary catechists….that would be you parents. And I would also like the attention of DRE’s, CCE catechists, aunts, uncles, and anyone else who has a role in the faith formation of children. Have you been looking for something to help you make Mass more acessible for your children? Want something to help you teach the Gospels to your children? Have I “found” something that I think you are going to want to check out!

Hear My Voice: A Children’s Translations of Gospel Readings of the Catholic Mass for 2009

This is from the letter sent to me by the author Jonathan Stampf:

The inspiration came from the challenge of keeping our little girls occupied and behaving at Mass. We tried the glass children’s room in our church, but that was more like a day-care center than Mass. I saw parents in the pews supplying the kids with baggies of Cheerios and coloring books, and though we resorted to that once or twice, that didn’t sit right with me. I saw some parents supply their kids with bible story books or children’s prayer books: a step in the right direction, but this still left the child disconnected from the Mass. Then it occurred to me to look for children’s bible stories synchronized with the lectionary cycle. Finding none, I wrote this book, the first in a series of three.


Is he singing the song of my frustration with bringing all three of my children into full participation in the Mass or what!? Except for the part about looking for bible stories connected to the lectionary…and then of course solving the problem by writing the solution….I could have written the above paragraph.

From the preface:

The intent of this book is to help parents and educators bring Jesus’ message to children in a way that will include them more fully in the weekly Mass. This book does not try to change the gospel stories to be stylish or impose the latest slang onto them. It is a children’s English translation, for our children to understand and hear Jesus’ voice more clearly as He speaks to them in the pages of the Gospel.

The gospel reading fom each Sunday’s Mass is represented in clear, simple, and sometimes expanded text that speaks to our children without speaking down to them. The text does not soften the demands of a life of faith, or water down the sadness or joy expressed in this great story.

I really like the idea behind this book. I would have loved to be able to have a quiet gospel time with my children before Mass so that they had already “met” the gospel for the week when they heard it at Mass. The gospel for each week of the entire cycle B of the lectionary (or November 30, 2008 to November 22, 2009) is printed in adult-sized type with the simplified version of the gospel written in large child-friendly print with engaging illustrations. There is absolutely nothing about this book that I didn’t like. I enthusiastically recommend it to every parent who is trying to walk with their children as they bring them into full participation at weekly Mass.

What a useful teaching tool this is! I took my galley copy with me to my RCIA class and there was an enthusiastic response from all of the parents present.

In the interest of full disclosure, if you order via the link in my sidebar (or the above link) I will be “paid” a small amount of the purchase price. I will donate any proceeds to Kiva and make a matching gift to the building of my parish’s new education building.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 01:53:53 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, September 29, 2008

What You Really Need Is An Intimate Relationship With Jesus

I’ve been told tonight that what I really need is “The JOY of a personal relationship with the Lord has been denied you due to the Catholic organization they have slipped in-between you and God the Father. Such a DRAG. I am here because I love you and care. Jesus came so you could have an intimate relation with the CREATOR of all the UNIVERSE is that heavy or what?” [I have edited the comment for what I assume were typos on the commentor’s part] (If you are interested in reading the whole conversation you can read at You Say To-May-to, I Say To-MAH-to in the comments section.) I posted this about the Catholic Mass a very long time ago, but I think that it’s time to re-post it because I would like people like the commentor above to understand that the Catholic Mass isn’t the rote ritual that many in Protestant forms of Christianity are told. Neither is it anti-scriptural. In fact it is taken from scripture in both content and meaning from beginning to end. The Catholic Mass not only presents that plan of Salvation but invites us humans to partake in it fully. So without further ado…

This is a copy of a post I made at the request of someone on the Sonlight forums who asked me to fill to explain about the Catholic Mass. In fact, this is the second of two posts I made. I the first one, I indicated that I had left some information out and was later asked to fill it in and as long as this is (be careful what you ask for), I assure you there is still more, much more, that could be said. As I worked on this, I was constantly…continuously ….overwhelmed at the task of conveying into finite words the infinite that is only glimpsed in the Mass. The more I said, the more I knew could be said and the more I realized that as far as I have come in understanding these Mysteries, I have done nothing more than skim along the surface of impossibly deep richness. I would like to also state categorically that I am not worthy to do this. I am not trained in theology in any way; therefore, any errors in expression or theology should be blamed on me alone and not held against either the Roman Catholic Church that I love, nor my brothers and sisters in the Catholic faith. I hope that my brothers and sisters would not hesitate to correct me in the places where I have said things poorly or even incorrectly and I welcome them to add their own personal observations as well. In this version, I have tried to integrate the scripture references of the Mass taken from Scripture in the Mass and any other place I could get them with my extended remarks on what God says to me in the Mass and what I in return, offer up to Him. On a technical note, I found myself flummoxed with the use of pronouns. The Unity expressed in the Liturgy of the Mass is sometimes difficult to break away from; however, I recognize that not everyone in the congregation is as devout as I suspect Our Lord would like them to be. I tried to use the first person plural where my personal reflections do not substantially reflect some well-known traditional practice and in places where although I join the action of the community, I am particularly involved as an individual such as during the penitential rite. Some of this is rather strongly stated. I understand that may cause distress in my brothers and sisters who do not share my view of the Truth; however, in order to adequately convey what I have found in the worship of the Roman Catholic Church, I cannot shy away from those aspects of it that are less palatable to those who prefer a more symbolic approach to unity, authority, and sacrament. I understand that many disagree with me. Not that you need it, but I give you leave to think I am a crackpot and sadly and completely deluded.  I am not trying to be gratuitously cranky.

Quote:
Originally Posted by someone on the Sonlight Forums

It is interesting that your faith is tied into the identity of the RC church. For me, my faith is dependent on Jesus Christ, period.


So much has been said in the last couple of weeks on Lifelong Learners. There have been so many hard hitting exchanges in here that you may find it odd that it that I suddenly took a break from all the other conversations in which I was participating to focus on these two sentences. But, for me, this strikes at the heart. So often I hear how the Roman Catholic Church puts things between me and Jesus, and that we substitute Mary and the Saints for where our focus really ought to be. Told that our identity isn’t really Jesus. That the faith of the Roman Catholic Church is empty, meaningless repetition and ritual. (I am not saying that’s what [person on the SL forums] (or anyone else in particular) meant to say or even that if she (they) did, that you meant it to be hurtful or offensive.) I would like to set the record straight though. Unfortunately, it is a sad fact of the divisions in the Our Lord’s Church that sometimes we must use words other than simply “Christian” to define what we believe. I assure you that my “identity as a Roman Catholic” IS my faith in Jesus Christ. Period. I have said something about a “fullness of faith” in the Roman Catholic Church that is not present in any Protestant denomination that I have been a part of. I want to state for the record that I did not leave my Evangelical Roots because I was unhappy there. In fact, I left my Evangelical roots loudly protesting to the Lord that I was very happy where I was thank you very much and did He really think this was necessary. In fact, there was a time in my life when I would have said to me, exactly the same things you have said. I also said that I was pretty sure that you couldn’t be Catholic and be saved. Catholics didn’t know Sacred Scripture. They didn’t respect Sacred Scripture. They believed in Saints and Mary not Jesus. Some of them even worshipped Mary. In fact, I have heard very little said about Catholics here on this forum that I did not say myself at one time. What I found in the Roman Catholic Church instead was a deep love and respect for Sacred Scripture. In fact, in the context of the Liturgy which is simultaneously drawn from and serves to explain scripture, I found a fullness of Sacred Scripture that I never had before. I found that far from elevating Sacred Scripture, the doctrine of sola scriptura had the effect of subordinating it to the intellect of the individual. In spite of the fact that I am no longer sola scriptura, the scriptures mean more to me now than ever before and I have the sense of believing it all instead of turning away from the uncomfortable parts. It is ironic to me that I gave the Lord my idols of my intellect and the scriptures and He gave them back to me breathed full of a new life. When I submitted to the authority that He deemed best for His Church and for me his daughter, I found a freedom I never had before. Just as I when I submit to the other authority structures created by God, in my family as a daughter and in my marriage as a wife…life just works better.

And I found Jesus everywhere I looked. Every nook and cranny. In the very air I breathed. The Mass that I had heard was empty of Jesus and nothing more than meaningless words and purposeless gestures from beginning to end, was suffused with Jesus.

I would like to tell you about The Mass because I want to show you in my own paltry pathetic words how I can say that my faith is dependent on Jesus Christ. Period. And how my RC faith supports that and does not detract from it.

Quote:
The ritual of the Mass could not possible be aught but sublime and beautiful because it has been fashioned by the Holy Ghost to be the one true worship in God’s one true Church. The same may be said of all the authorized ceremonial of the Catholic Church for all her liturgical services: It enshrines and adorns the inward offering of the faithful; it is the setting, the framework, so to call it, encircling some doctrinal truth, some revealed truth of God; it is the divinely appointed ceremony and form of giving back to God that which he himself first taught us. It is the belief of Catholics (as it is a fact) that Almighty God has shown us not only the right faith, but also the right form of worship. He has prescribed a method for offering him public adoration. He has not left us to haphazard or chance. Mass, then, is the liturgy that Almighty God has willed as the chief act of Christian worship, we have no right to attempt any other. Must it not, therefore, be lovely and attractive? “From the Kirk to the Catholic Church” in Where We Got The Bible: Our Debt To The Catholic Church by Henry G. Graham


Let me start at the beginning and give you a little framework about how I believe Sacred Scripture to speak about the subject of worship. First, worship as seen in the Old Testament is defined by God. We don’t know the specific instructions given to Adam but we do know that when Cain had his own ideas about the way things should be, he was corrected by God. I see in the Old Testament that God gave the form of worship in detail and that any time folks got a hankering to tinker with the rules (2 Chronicles 26:16-23; Exodus 30:36-38; Leviticus 10:1-3) there were consequences. I see that throughout the Old Testament, God never left it up to “us” when it comes to what He wants from us in the way of worship……fortunately for us, because the Bible is full of examples of what happens when we take matters into our own hands. Nowhere in scripture do I see any indication that God is leaving it up-to-us in the New Covenant. He defined worship in the Old Covenant; I am left with the expectation that He will do so in the New Covenant. So when Jesus says at the Last Supper, during the last moments He will have before His Sacrifice on the cross, “Do this in memory of me,” I have to believe that it is significant. He is facing His execution. Time is short. Whatever He says and does in those moments is not going to be one of the little things.

Old Testament worship was not only the foreshadowing of the coming perfect sacrifice, it also prefigured worship in the New Covenant. Under the Old Covenant the sin sacrifices were offered over and over to remind the people of the coming of the Lamb of God that would take the place of Isaac. In the New Covenant, the Perfect Sacrifice is made present to us in the offering of the Mass simultaneously calling to mind the Incarnation and acting as a foreshadowing of the Second Coming and the Feast of the Lamb in Revelation. In the Old Testament, Melchizedek, a priest and king, offered bread and wine prefiguring the bread and wine offered by Jesus, priest and king in the New Testament. (Hebrews 7:1-7) The sacrifice of Jesus is also prefigured in Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac. Isaac carried his own wood up hill to one of the hills of what would later become Jerusalem only to be told by God that He would provide Himself the Lamb. But those are not the only significant images of Old Testament worship that are fulfilled in Jesus and establishment of worship in the New Covenant. The deliverance of the Israelites from the land of Egypt (a land gripped with a religion of death itself and the Israelites literally in bondage to death) prefigures our deliverance from sin. This is God’s metaphor for salvation written into the very lives and experiences of his Chosen People. The Passover lamb was killed and eaten…not simply killed…the blood placed on the doors and the Angel of Death passed over their homes. God however, did not intend to save the Israelites from just the Angel of Death. This was a rescue mission. Action was required. They had to gird their loins, eat the Passover dinner while standing and ready to leave; and then, they had to leave the bloody door behind taking with them the riches they were given, and flee the land of death. To escape the pursuing Egyptians, the Israelites passed through the waters of the Red Sea (prefiguring Baptism) and entered into the desert. There they begin their long preparation for entering the Promised Land. While wandering in the desert, God fed them on manna a substance that resembles bread but acts like flesh (gets wormy and rots not molds — Exodus 16:20). God decreed Passover as a perpetual ordinance and establishes the OT sacrificial worship system. Again, we see offerings of both fine (wheat) flour (bread) and animal sacrifice with a differentiation between the holocaust offering which was not eaten and the sin sacrifice that was.

Later God’s only son, identified in the first line of the New Testament as Abraham’s son, carried the wood of the cross up the hill to be the Lamb provided by God. The very circumstances of his birth in a stable with the animals, visited by the shepherds that watched the flocks of animals destined to become temple sacrifices called to mind his destiny as a sin sacrifice. Driven into Jerusalem on the day the Passover lambs were brought into the city, it is thought that Jesus died at the same time as the afternoon sin sacrifice in the Temple. The sin sacrifice is at the center of what God demands for our reconciliation with Him. At the Last Supper, Jesus, the Perfect Sin Sacrifice, decreed that in the New Covenant, worship would be centered on His Sacrifice. He tied all of the threads of Old Testament worship into one miraculous memorial. Priest and King and Lamb, Bread and Wine, Body and Blood and just as the Israelites were required to eat the Passover Lamb, to eat the sin sacrifice so are we required to do so in the New Covenant. Just as God provided bread that acted like flesh to feed them in the time from their deliverance from the land of death before their entrance to the Promised Land, He has done the same for us. The Apostles, steeped in the prophetic rituals and remembrances of the Old Testament would have understood what eating the flesh of Jesus meant. If Jesus meant for Holy Communion to be anything other than his literal Body and Blood, He would have needed to explain that. Not vice versa. The Gospels repeatedly speak of details that mark Jesus as the fulfillment of the Passover Lamb/Sin Sacrifice….no broken bones (Exodus 12:46), wine from hyssop (Exodus 12:22), and when speaking of Jesus garment at the time of crucifixion John uses the same term used for the priests’ vestments when offering a sacrifice. Just as Jesus didn’t back away from the hard words He spoke in John 6, He didn’t soften what He said in those last hours before His Passion.

Old Testament worship was transformed by the Perfect Sacrifice. The Temple was no longer necessary but all of the elements of Old Testament worship remained. Instead of the imperfect ram that substituted for Abraham’s son, and the animal sacrifices that were to be offered repeatedly; Jesus established a new form that fulfilled all the elements of the Old Testament prophecies and practice and itself foreshadows the worship of heaven. It is only in the mystical re-presentation of the sacrifice of Jesus in the Mass that the threads of worship seen in the Old Testament are all brought together, remembered, renewed, and present a renewed foreshadowing of what is to come in heaven (numerous references in Revelation). Well-educated, devout Catholics believe that in the Mass we literally enter into the eternal worship as pictured in the Book of Revelation (CCC 1089, 1090, 1136). Jesus as Priest and Victim is always present at the altar in heaven where the angels sing for eternity “Holy, Holy, Holy” and it is we…bound in time and on earth that come and go from that altar in worship in the Mass.

Quote:
When a Roman Catholic “goes to church”, he sees himself as joining himself to something that is already going on. He sets aside both the hurly-burly of his domestic or professional situation and any preoccupation he may have with such patently excellent concerns as fellowship or chat or even certain vitality in the air. He has been summoned to the unum necessarium. He here takes his place – literally, he believes – with angels and archangels and with all the company of heaven…. Thomas Howard in On Being Catholic

(I highly recommend The Lamb’s Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth by Scott Hahn and On Being Catholic by Thomas Howard.)

I have often heard non-Catholics say that they appreciate the sense of reverence in the Catholic Mass. Heck…I said it myself before I was Catholic. I tell you honestly, that the “appreciation” I had of that reverence only scratched the surface of what was really there. I knew that Catholics bowed and kneeled but I never really understood how specific those actions were and the whys behind them. Let me try to walk you through some of the details of the Catholic Mass to try and show you how Christ is to the believing Catholic in the Mass.

When we first walk through the door and into the church, we dip our fingers in holy water and make the sign of the cross. Why? To remind ourselves that we enter the church through the waters of baptism. To renew our baptismal promises. In this simple gesture we proclaim our belief in the Trinity (“In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”) and remind ourselves why we are here (the symbol of the Cross).

Before we take our place in the pews, we turn toward the Tabernacle (prefigured in the Old Testament by the Holy of Holies) which holds the reserved consecrated communion hosts and therefore, by our Catholic beliefs, contains the Real Presence of Christ, and genuflect (kneeling and making the sign of the cross). In this way we acknowledge Christ’s presence in the Sanctuary and His Lordship over us. If for some reason the Blessed Sacrament has been removed from the Tabernacle (the candle which indicates the presence of the Blessed Sacrament in the Tabernacle will be extinguished), Catholics will still bow toward the altar in recognition of the Sacrifice that Christ made for us on the Cross that is re-presented in the Mass. Furthermore, if at any time during the Mass (or if you are in the Sanctuary for another reason) you cross the from one side of the church to the other, walk to the front of the church, or away from the front of the church, or walk in front of the Tabernacle (or altar) devout Catholics solemnly bow or genuflect….every. time. As an aside, Catholics are often considered unfriendly because they do not stay after Mass and “chat.” Well they may be unfriendly, but the not staying and chatting in the church comes from reverence. It is considered inappropriate to “chit-chat” in the Sanctuary in the literal presence of Jesus. He is Our Lord and we are always to be mindful and respectful of that while in the Sanctuary.

Now that we are in and sitting, we are encouraged to take a few moments in prayer to prepare for Mass (again chit-chat is discouraged) and especially to examine our conscience in preparation. As we stand to begin the celebration of Mass (and prayerful, mindful attendance is known as “assisting” at Mass rather than merely “attending” CCC 1140, 1142, 1143) the procession makes its way down the aisle. Leading the procession is the cross…the visible sign of our salvation possibly flanked by servers carrying candles to remind us that this is our hope. There may be more people following the cross, but the Book of the Gospels is held aloft just ahead of the priest who will be the principle celebrant. Not a lectionary, not a catechism, the Gospels. The Gospels which are the heart of Sacred Scripture because they tell us about Jesus, His incarnation, His Ministry, and His Passion and they provide a visible reminder of the importance of Sacred Scripture.

Liturgy of the Word/Mass of the Catechumens

As the Mass begins we again make the sign of the cross and again acknowledge the Trinity in whose name the proceedings are to be conducted and our need for redemption by the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross.

Quote:
Greeting:

Priest: In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. (Matt. 28:19)

People: Amen (1 Chr 16:36)

Priest: The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all. (2 Cor 13:13; 1 Corinthians 1:3)

People: And also with you.

After a brief greeting we acknowledge our sinfulness to God. It is a personal and public confession of guilt. I acknowledge that because of my sin Jesus had to come and suffer and die. My relationship to God as a sinner in need of redemption is reinforced and I ask “Blessed Mary, ever Virgin, all the angels and saints, and you my brothers and sisters to pray for me to the Lord our God.” Notice that the relationship expressed in this pray is that I am a sinner in need of help and I am asking everyone around me to remember me to God who is offended by my sin. There is no blurriness regarding divinity….at least for me. Then I immediately ask mercy from the Trinity acknowledging that forgiveness comes from God and asking for peace (reconciliation in the forgiveness of my sins).

Quote:
Penitential Rite (Luke 23:48; Zechariah 12:10; Luke 18:13):

All: I confess to almighty God, and to you my brothers and sisters, that I have sinned through my own fault. (Jas. 5:16) In my thoughts and in my words, (Rom. 12:16) In what I have done and what I have failed to do; (Jas 3:6) and I ask the Blessed Virgin Mary, all the angel and saints, and you, my brothers and sisters, to pray for me to the Lord our God. (1 Thess 5:25)

Priest: May almighty God have mercy on us, forgive us our sins, and bring us to everlasting life. (1 John 1:9)

People: Amen (1 Chr 16:36)

All: Lord have mercy. (Tb 8:4) Christ have mercy. (1 Tim 1:2) Lord have mercy. (also Matthew 9:27-30; Matthew 15:22-28; Mark 10:46-52)

In the next instant we celebrate the granting of that peace and remember the coming of Jesus as a baby in Bethlehem with a hymn of praise (sometimes we even sing it, often though it is only recited) known as the “Gloria” The opening line of this hymn comes from the angels’ song at Jesus birth “Glory to God in the highest and peace to His people on earth.”…..we are again celebrating Jesus as the source of our Peace. The Peace that is granted through the forgiveness of sin that He alone made possible.

Quote:
Gloria:

All: Glory to God in the highest, and peace to his people on earth. (Luke 2:14)

Lord God, heavenly King, almighty God and Father, (Rev 19:6) we worship you, (Rev. 22:9) we give you thanks, (Eph. 5:20)we praise you for your glory. (Rev 7:12)

Lord Jesus Christ, only Son of the Father, (2 John 3) Lord God, Lamb of God, you take away the sin of the world: have mercy on us; (John 1:29) You are seated at the right hand of the Father, receive our prayer. (Rom 8:34)

For you alone are the Holy One, (Luke 4:34) You alone are Lord, You alone are the Most High, Jesus Christ, (Luke 1:32) with the Holy Spirit, in the glory of God the Father. (John 14:26)

And then, we act on the faith we have expressed in a loving and forgiving God who provided us the Word Incarnate and we pray. The text of the opening prayer varies from week to week. I will quote a sample here from May 7, 2006:

Quote:
Almighty and ever-living God,
Give us new strength
From the courage of Christ our shepherd,
And lead us to join the saints in heaven,
Where he lives and reigns with you
And the Holy Spirit,
One God, forever and ever.

Next comes the Liturgy of the Word. On an average Sunday we hear a reading from the Old Testament (Romans 15:4), one from the Psalms, one from the New Testament, and then the Gospel reading (Mark 14:9; Matthew 24:14; Revelation 14:6). The OT reading is always directly tied to the Gospel reading. (Easter Vigil Mass has up to ten large portions of scripture read.) The scripture is read from a special pulpit, called the ambo, that is set aside for the reading of the Word of God and the homilies. Announcements are not allowed from this pulpit….well at least they are not supposed to be made from there. Not everyone knows this rule and I suspect that dispensation is granted for very small churches without appropriate facilities. The point is that wherever possible we are to give a special place of honor to the reading and hearing of Sacred Scripture. The hearing of scripture is important in the Catholic Church because James 1:22-23 tells us that we are to not to just hear the word but we are to be doers of the word and Romans 10:17 tells us that faith comes through hearing (not reading) the Word. The Catechism of the Catholic Church strongly encourages faithful Catholics to read Sacred Scripture regularly; nevertheless, the Catholic Church is mindful that the literal sense of scripture cannot be ignored and that we must also hear the words of Sacred Scripture. For this reason if you attend Mass daily, you will hear very nearly the entire Bible read aloud to you in the course of three years and a very substantial portion if you only attend on Sundays. After the readings, the lector announces “The Word of the Lord” and the congregation affirms “Thanks be to God.” (Romans 6:17-18; Romans 7:24-25; 1 Corinthians 15:56-57; 2 Corinthians 2:14; 2 Corinthians 9:15) When the Gospel is read, the congregation stands in honor of Jesus because the Gospel is the life, ministry, and words of our Lord and Savior, Jesus. During Mass, only a Priest or a Deacon is allowed to read the Gospel (we are allowed to read the Gospels outside of Mass of course). Preceding the Gospel reading we trace the sign of the cross on our foreheads (calling to mind Revelation 7:3 and 14:1), our lips, and our hearts accompanied by a prayer that God would keep his words on in our hearts and minds and on our lips. (Luke 8:12)

Click here to get today’s liturgical readings from the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

After the homily (2 Tim 4:1-2) we recite a statement of faith usually in the form of the Nicene Creed.

Quote:
Profession of Faith (the Nicene (or Apostles) Creed)

All:

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth, (Gen 14:19) of all that is seen and unseen. (Col 1:16)

We believe in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, (Luke 1:35) eternally begotten of the Father, God from God, Light from Light, True God from True God, begotten not made, one in being with the Father. (Heb 1:3) Through him all things were made. (John 1:2-3) For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven: (John 3:13) by the power of the Holy Spirit he was born of the Virgin Mary, (Matt 1:18) and became man. For our sake he was crucified under Pontius Pilate, (John 19:16) he suffered, died and was buried. On the third day he rose again in fulfillment of the Scriptures. (1 Cor 15:3-4) He ascended into heaven (Luke 24:51) and is seated at the right hand of the Father. (Col 3:1) He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead (2 Tim 4:1) and his kingdom will have no end. (Luke 1:33)

We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of Life, (Acts 2:17) who proceeds from the Father and the Son. (John 14:16) With the Father and Son he is worshiped and glorified. He has spoken through the prophets. (1 Peter 1:10-11)

We believe in one holy, catholic and apostolic Church. (Rom 12:5) We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins. (Acts 2:38) We look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come. (Rom 6:5) Amen

The Apostle’s Creed (simpler) is generally reserved for Masses that are primarily for children. Again, the focus is on the Trinity and the means of our salvation through Jesus Christ. At the words “by the power of the Holy Spirit” we bow…in honor of the Holy Spirit. In a very real sense, Catholics pray a prayer of Salvation at every Mass. This is followed by prayers of the faithful. In an act of faith reinforcing what we have just said, we offer our petitions both general and private to God.

Now we are just getting to the part where we really focus on Jesus. What has gone before was just to remind us that we were sinners, that God provided His Son for our salvation.

I recall to mind the events on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:13-35) where Jesus spoke to the Apostles on the road at length from the scriptures (Liturgy of the Word) and their hearts burned within them (v. 32) and so they asked Him to come and stay with them (v. 29) and they knew Him in the breaking of the Bread. (Liturgy of the Eucharist) (v. 35). I have had Our Lord speak to me from the scriptures both in the written form and in persona Christi as the Priest spoke to me to explain the Sacred Scripture just as Jesus did for the Apostles. (No…the Priest is not divine, nor is he actually Christ. He has only been given the authority to act in the place of Christ.) Now it is time to beg Jesus to remain with me and I joyfully await knowing Him in the breaking of the bread.

Liturgy of the Eucharist/Mass of the Faithful

The gifts (offering, bread, and wine) are brought to the altar and prepared. (Malachi 3:10) I try to remember the loaves and the fishes and wonder that God accepts our tiny gifts and does something marvelous with them. Without God all that we have is foul, but He takes our gifts…our possessions, our deeds, our hearts, our thoughts…all that we have and are, and purifies them. The offering is set to the side and the bread and wine are blessed and prepared. The priest takes a drop of water (which symbolizes humanity) and places it in the wine (symbolizing the divinity of Christ) the blessing said over the cup is derived from the Jewish Kiddush and in imitation of Christ at the Last Supper when He took the bread and wine and blessed it. The priest then washes his hands. This ritualizes the prayer of Psalm 51 from which he recites (usually inaudibly) “Lord wash away my sins, cleanse me from my iniquities” and recalls the act of Pilate at the condemnation of Jesus.

Quote:
Priest: Blessed are you, Lord, God of all creation. Through your goodness we have this bread to offer, which earth has given and human hands have made. (Eccl. 3:13) It will become for us the bread of life. (John 6:35)

People: Blessed be God forever. (Ps 68:36)

Priest: Blessed are you, Lord, God of all creation. Through your goodness we have this wine to offer, fruit of the vine and work of human hands. It will become our spiritual drink. (Luke 22:17-18)

People: Blessed be God forever. (Ps 68:36)

Priest: Pray, brethren, that our sacrifice may be acceptable to God, the almighty Father. (Heb. 12:28)

People: May the Lord accept the sacrifice at your hands for the praise and glory of his name, for our sake and the good of all his Church. (Ps 50:23)

The Eucharistic prayers that follow start with a preface. Here I will quote from Cyril of Jerusalem in 350 A.D. Notice that the words of the priest have hardly changed in the last 1700 years. In fact all of the elements of the Mass and very often the very words of the Mass that have been outlined show up in the earliest records of the Church:

Quote:
Originally Posted by St. Cyril
The priest cries out: “Lift up your hearts!” For in this most solemn hour it is necessary for us to have our hearts raised up with God, and not fixed below, on the earth and earthly things. It is as if the priest instructs us at this hour to dismiss all physical cares and domestic anxieties, and to have our hearts in heaven with the benevolent God. Then you answer: “We have lifted them up to the Lord,” giving assent to it by acknowledgment that you make. Let no one come here, then, who could say with his mouth, “We have lifted them up to the Lord,” while he is preoccupied with physical cares.

Quote:
Eucharistic Prayers:

Priest: Lift up your hearts.

People: We lift them up to the Lord. (Lam 3:41)

Priest: Let us give thanks to the Lord Our God. (Col 3:17)

People: It is right to give him thanks and praise. (Col 1:3)

This is followed by the acclamation we hear in Isaiah 6:3, Mark 11:9-10 and in heaven itself in Revelation 4:8 “Holy, Holy, Holy is the Lord God Almighty…” Remember we believe that the praise and worship of The Lamb (Jesus) as Priest and Victim is eternally present in heaven and that through the Mass we enter into that very praise and worship of heaven. As Catholics, parousia, or the Second Coming has two simultaneous meanings. Christ literally comes to us in the Eucharist in every Mass and even so, we also look for the Second Coming described in Acts 1:11. As Catholics we are not only looking for that time when we are fully present, fully alive, and fully aware in heaven to join in that worship we also believe that in this life we join into the worship of heaven even if we do not perceive it with our senses every time we go to Mass. And because we believe we are about to literally enter the Presence of Jesus, we hit our knees, because we read in scripture that at “the name of Jesus every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord.”

Quote:
Preface acclamation:

All: Holy, holy, holy Lord, God of power and might, heaven and earth are full of your glory. (Is 6:3) Hosanna in the highest. Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. Hosanna in the highest. (Mark 11:9-10)

And now comes the recitation of the events of the Last Supper, where Jesus set as a memorial for all time the bread and wine becoming His Body and Blood. He miraculously unites all the pieces of Old Testament worship: the bread and wine offered by priest and king, Melchizedek, with the sacrifices prefigured by Abraham, Passover, and the Temple; we join all the citizens of heaven in the worship of Jesus, simultaneously Priest and Victim eternally present at the altar of heaven; and we remember the terrible price He paid for our redemption. The cost of the blood on the doorposts prefigured so long ago.

Quote:
Eucharistic prayer:

[There are four of these, based on ancient prayers of the Church. Eucharistic Prayer Two follows as an example:]

Priest: Lord, you are holy indeed, the fountain of all holiness. (2 Macc. 14:36) Let your spirit come upon these gifts (water and wine and bread) to make them holy, so that they may become the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ. Before he was given up to death, (Phil 2:8) a death he freely accepted, (John 10:17-18) he took bread and gave you thanks. He broke the bread, gave it to his disciples, and said: Take this all of you, and eat it: this is my body which will be given up for you. When supper was ended, he took the cup. Again he gave thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and drink from it: this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this is memory of me. (Mark 14:22-25) Let us proclaim the mystery of faith.

All: Dying you destroyed our death, rising you restored our life, Lord Jesus, come in glory. (Heb 2:14-15)

Priest: In memory of his death and resurrection, we offer you, Father, this life-giving bread, this saving cup. (John 6:51) We thank you for counting us worthy to stand in your presence and serve you. May all of us who share in the body and blood of Christ be brought together in unity by the Holy Spirit. (1 Cor.10:17) Lord, remember your Church throughout the world; make us grow in love together with our Pope and our bishop, and all the clergy. Remember our brothers and sisters who have gone to their rest in the hope of rising again: bring them and all the departed into the light of your presence. (2 Macc 12:45-46) Have mercy on us all; make us worthy to share eternal life with Mary, the virgin Mother of God, with the apostles and with all the saints who have done your will throughout the ages. May we praise you in union with them, and give you glory though your Son, Jesus Christ. (2 Thes 1:4-5) Through him, with him, in him, in the unity of the Holy Spirit, all glory and honor is yours, almighty Father, for ever and ever.

All: Amen. (Rom 11:36)

At the moment of consecration (where the Priest says the words “This is my Body” and “This is my Blood”) we bow our heads and pray silently “My Lord and My God.” The amen which closes the Eucharistic prayer is called the “Great Amen” because that Amen is repeated several times (usually in song) to give our assent and to show that we have been united with the Priest in all that He has done.

The Eucharistic Prayer is followed by a recitation of The Lord’s Prayer (Matthew 6:9-13; Luke 11:2-4). We pray again as an act of faith, that God in heaven hears us because of the reconciliation provided by Jesus. The Lord’s Prayer reminds us that our destination is with God in heaven (prefigured in the Mass) and that God will glorify His Name in answer to the prayer of Jesus (John 12:28); that although Jesus has already come to us in the Mass that the Second Coming is drawing near (Luke 21:31). We remind ourselves that we are dependant on him for our sustenance (Luke 14:15); that we are forgiven but that we must also extend the peace God has given us to others (Matthew 18:34-35). We ask to be kept from the final trial (Revelation 3:10) and delivered from evil (Luke 21:28).

Quote:
Communion Rite:

The Lord’s Prayer:

All: Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. (Matt 6:9-13)

Priest: Deliver us, Lord, from every evil and grant us peace in our day. In your mercy keep us from sin and protect us from all anxiety as we wait in joyful hope for the coming of our savior, Jesus Christ. (John 17:15)

All: For the kingdom the power and the glory are yours, now and forever. Amen

And then there is Peace. But the Peace that is granted to us by Our Lord is not for us alone. We must show it to others (Matthew 5:23-24; 1 Corinthians 16:20; 2 Corinthians 13:12; Romans 16:16; 1 Thessalonians 5:26) and in this part of the Mass, we reach out to our brothers and sisters in love and friendship. It is also a visible reminder that we must always be at peace with our brothers and sisters before approaching the altar of God (Matthew 5:23)

Quote:
Priest: Lord Jesus Christ, you said to your apostles; I leave you peace, my peace I give to you. (John 14:27) Look not on our sins, but on the faith of your Church, and grant us the peace and unity of your kingdom where you live forever and ever.

Priest: The peace of the Lord be with you always! (John 20:19)

People: And also with you!

[The priest then directs the people to exchange a sign, such as a handshake or a kiss, or a word of God’s peace to one another.]

Here the priest breaks the bread as Jesus did at the Last Supper (Luke 22:19). He also breaks off a small piece of a consecrated host and drops it into the chalice. This is called co-mingling. The bread and wine are consecrated separately representing the death of Our Lord. The co-mingling of the Body and Blood represents the Resurrection and Jesus’ victory over death. It also symbolizes the unity of the Church. In the early Church, a piece the Eucharist was taken from the Pope’s Mass to other churches and mingles with their Eucharistic species to show that all of the churches were one with each other. In the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus prayed that we would be one as His Father and He were one that the world might believe. (John 17:20-23) Again we see in the Catholic Mass a stark lack of symbolism in that and a headlong plunge into the harsh literalness of Our Lord’s words.

Again I am reminded of the Road to Emmaus where they recognized Jesus in the breaking of the bread. (Luke 24:31)

Our response is in imitation of the centurion who tells Jesus that he is not worthy to receive him and that Jesus can heal his servant from a distance. (Luke 7:6-7) Jesus praises the centurion’s faith. (Luke 7:9)

Quote:
Breaking of the Bread:

All: Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world: have mercy on us. Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world: have mercy on us. Lamb of God, you take away the sins of the world, grant us peace. (John 1:29)

Where are the words to describe receiving my Lord in Holy Communion? To a certain extent I can describe why I believe the way that I do. I can even glance off the surface of the mysteries leading to this point. But to receive the Lamb of God, the Bread of Heaven, into my body? There are not words. My Passover Lamb, the sacrifice for my sins, Bread of Heaven…Manna for my time here in the wilderness and I long for the Feast Heaven. For the day when my Savior will welcome me home.

I am further blessed with the privilege of being allowed to serve Holy Communion in my parish. I raise the host for each communicant and declare “The Body of Christ” (or if I am a cup minister “The Blood of Christ”) and after bowing solemnly, the communicant responds with “Amen!” I am often struck in the course of these duties with a sense of Christ’s overwhelming love for each of these precious people and how very different they are. Each face, each set of eyes that meet mine, some devout, some appearing not to be, some with faces shining with joy and others bearing the traces of the stress of difficult lives….Jesus knows them each, the corners of their hearts, the secret places of their being, the very number of hairs on their heads and He meets them precisely where they are. I am humbled that I am allowed to be the tiniest of his servants and that He deigns to use me to serve His Body and Blood to others. Of course, the wonder of it all is that Our Creator uses any of us at all, ever, to accomplish his purposes.

Quote:
Communion:

Priest: This is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Happy are those who are called to his supper. (Rev. 19:9)

People: Lord, I am not worthy to receive you, but only say the word and I shall be healed. (Matt 8:8)

[Communion is distributed to the faithful at the altar by the priest and lay ministers.]

After receiving Holy Communion, we take our places and kneel in a time of intimate prayer while the rest of the congregation receives. There are many, many prayers that have been composed for this time. I personally like the words of Simeon in Luke 2:29-32 “Now, Master, you may let your servant go in peace, according to your word, for my eyes have seen your salvation, which you prepared in sight of all the peoples, a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and glory for your people Israel.” And then I spend time praying as the Lord leads and like Mary, pondering on these things in my heart. (Luke 2:19)

After Holy Communion has been distributed, the Priest, Deacon, and the Eucharistic ministers (the lay people who help distribute Holy Communion) see to the reposition of the Body and Blood. Because we believe that Our Lord is actually present in the Eucharist, it is treated with great reverence and precautions are taken to make sure that the consecrated hosts are not subject to careless treatment or sacrilege. Any extra consecrated hosts are placed in the Tabernacle where they are used to bring Holy Communion to the sick and homebound of the Parish and local nursing homes and hospitals. If there is remaining Precious Blood in the cup, it is consumed. The vessels used for serving are rinsed and because the rinse water still contains traces of the Body and Blood the rinse water is also consumed. After the Mass, the vessels receive a more thorough purification.

Finally, we reach the point of the Mass from which is derives its name. The blessing and dismissal. In Latin, the Mass ends with ite missa est. which means ‘go, it is sent’ with ‘it’ meaning the church. We have worked through the plan of salvation from sinfulness, to incarnation, to Jesus’ life (in the scriptures), His death, and resurrection. This part of the Mass that recalls Jesus final instructions at the Ascension when the disciples were sent into the world.

Quote:
Dismissal:

Priest: Blessed be the name of the Lord. Now and forever. (Dan 2:20) May almighty God bless you, the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. (Luke 24:51) Go in peace (Luke 7:50) to love and serve the Lord. (2 Chr 35:3)

[During the blessing the people make the Sign of the Cross, the traditional sign of the baptized and a public sign of their belief in the power of God.]

People: Thanks be to God. (2 Cor 9:15)

Usually a hymn is sung during concluding rites. The priest goes to the altar and kisses it. He joins the others ministers, bows, and then preceded by the cross, they exit the church.

As we leave the church (no chit-chatting) we again genuflect acknowledging the Lorship of Jesus and His presence in the Tabernacle. We bless ourselves again with holy water on the way out, again claiming our place in the family of God by right of our Baptism.

Quote:
O truly sublime and wonderful worship of the Roman Catholic Church! Beautiful outwardly, beautiful inwardly, made according to the pattern God himself has shown, no marvel is it that so many distracted and tempest-tossed souls have been riveted and fascinated and consoled by it. No wonder that is should have satisfied their heart and their intellect as well as their senses, for Jesus Christ, “the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world,” is in it. He is the center of the worship of the Catholic Church, for he is the Sacrifice of the Church. Where We Got The Bible: Our Debt To The Catholic Church by Henry G. Graham

As a Catholic, the Mass completely focuses me on Jesus and the entire plan of salvation. It is the lynchpin of it all and that’s where the worship is. The Liturgy explains the Sacred Scripture and Sacred Scripture illuminates the Liturgy and together they give a clearer picture of Jesus than either alone. Every detail….in many cases even the architecture of the Church…serve to show the mysteries of faith. I am in (Although recently we almost had Mass in the First Baptist Church in town when our air conditioner broke down. They are seriously and truly our sister church. We love them and they love us.) points to Jesus and His sacrifice on the cross. And as a Catholic there is much that we to believe to be the literal making present of the mysteries of Salvation. I remember that as a Protestant judging Catholics based on what I knew of the Catholic faith it was always easy for me to see just how “idolatrous” they were. Coming into the Catholic faith I have to say it wasn’t education regarding Catholic teaching about “the saints” that made me realize how I had misjudged (although that certainly was also important), it was education about the Mass and the Eucharist that put things into perspective. Say what you will about me as a Catholic, I understand that you probably continue to take issue with lots of things that I believe, but please don’t hastily judge the place of Jesus in my worship or my life based on the words the divisions in Our Lord’s church have made necessary.

Now if any of you ever have a hankering to actually attend a Mass in the Catholic Church, I want to give you fair warning. The above description covers just one variation of The Mass. Some parts are always the same. Some parts have several variations from which to select such as the Eucharistic prayer and the penitential rite. Under some circumstances the celebrant might opt not to recite the creed and there are some portions which might be performed silently by the celebrant such as preparation of the gifts. There are also some small variations based on the liturgical season. For example, the Alleluia that precedes the gospel reading is omitted during Lent. Below I have listed some references that might be helpful to those who want to know what the Roman Catholic Church actually teaches and why:

Searchable Catechism of the Catholic Church: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm

Scripture Catholic: http://www.scripturecatholic.com/

Coming Home Network: http://www.chnetwork.org/

Catholic Bridge: http://www.catholicbridge.com/index.html

Bible Christian Society: http://www.biblechristiansociety.com/

Instruction Concerning Worship Of The Eucharistic Mystery: http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/JP2INAES.HTM

I will be happy to email this in the form of a Word document to anyone who would like it: redneckwomandesigns*at*yahoo*dot*com

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 02:30:19 | Permalink | No Comments »

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Do Catholics Worship Images of Christ?….my thoughts.

Let me start by saying that I was wrong in my post the other day (Catholics and the Second Commandment), I said that it didn’t look like the newsletters posted on JustForCatholics.org were archived. I was wrong. I have discovered them on what is presumably Dr. Mizzi’s blog which is here for those who are interested. Unfortunately in learning that I ended up having to slosh a whole bucket full of water on my head because wouldn’t you know it my hair burst into flames. It was this remark from his March ‘08 newletter that pushed me right over the edge.

Some Protestants continue to allege that Catholics worship images despite their constant denial. I happen to be one of those Protestants.

And I sighed and ran for the bucket of water.  The first thing that really bothers me is that this really should not be an issue for Protestants seeking to evangelize Catholics. As a Catholic I find this whole you-worship-statues thing to be seriously irritating because it suggests that I am incapable of defining what I worship and what I don’t. I promise you that I am not shy about saying what I believe in and if I was worshiping a statue, I would loudly and proudly proclaim it. I am occasionally absent-minded. If you read this blog at all, you know I am the typo queen and proofreading is not my strong suit, but I am not a blithering idiot. I know what I worship and it isn’t statues!! Or images! Or Mary for that matter. Here’s a hint to all of you Protestants who want to see me leave the Roman Catholic Church. You would be so much more effective if you worked at changing my mind about something that we AGREE that I am doing, rather than wasting your time convincing me that I am doing something that I am not and telling me to stop doing that thing I am not doing to begin with. (If you have a glass of wine, that last sentence will make sense.) If you want to get me to leave the Roman Catholic Church, stop picking at the edges of what I believe in and YANK THE RUG out from under me and you can start by focusing on the things that I freely admit doing.

I worship Jesus in the Eucharist.


And as hideously offensive as sites like this are, at least they get it! Let’s take the trivial stuff off of the table. I believe that in the Eucharist there is no longer bread and wine but Jesus present Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity. I WORSHIP Jesus in the Eucharist. When I am alone in the Adoration chapel, I remove my shoes (holy ground), I cover myself, and I prostrate myself on the ground and worship my Lord. If I am guilty of idolatry, it is THERE and not over some picture. I know that if the Roman Catholic Church is wrong about the Real Presence I am guilty of the worst idolatry and anything I have done in relationship to a statue or a picture will pale in comparision. If I am going to hell for idolatry it will be because I believe Jesus, my Lord, my Sin Sacrifice, my Shepherd is truly present in the Eucharist and worship Him there and the Roman Catholic Church was wrong about that.
 
That brings me to my next point. I have long suspected that Protestants accuse Catholics of worshipping all sorts of things that they don’t, because they [the Protestants] have not been exposed to worship as Jesus intended. So much is worship in a Protestant church if it happens on Sunday morning. (And I say this as a former Protestant.) Lead the congregation in singing songs that make us feel good about Jesus…worship led by the “Worship Team.” Pray….worship. A pastor-led bible study….worship. It’s no wonder that they look at a Catholic and say to themselves “If I did that, it would be worship; therefore, they are worshiping [that statue, Mary, that picture, etc.]” Since when should we get to define what worship is? Cain had his own ideas….got thumped. Aaron had some ideas….got thumped…along with everyone who agreed with him. Nadab and Abihu had their own ideas and got blasted!! Samuel lost his right to the kingship of Israel because he decided it didn’t really matter enough to do it God’s way and after all he had a really important reason like Samuel was selling indulgences and didn’t show up in time! (Oh wait, I am mixing up my stories it was other people who decided that they had the right to re-define worship because they didn’t like how quickly God’s appointed representatives were cleaning up a problem.) When I look in the Old Testament I see very clearly that worship involves sacrifice and offerings and it’s more about sacrifice than offering and in the New Testament, Jesus fulfills the Old Testament Passover meal (which had a sacrifice) and the Old Testament sacrificial system in Himself and decreed a new form of worship for the New Covenant. (Jesus in the Catholic Mass has a slightly more expanded version of that). Jesus said at the Last Supper, on the night He was to give himself freely to the executioners as our eternal sin sacrifice, “Do this in memory of me.” There it is. That’s how we are to worship Him….if you are not remembering Him in your worship as He decreed, if you are not eating from the Fruit of the Tree of Life (Jesus on the Cross); then, you don’t have enough Jesus. Just as the Jews presented sin sacrifices in worship that prefigured the ONE Perfect Sin Sacrifice, Catholics enter into the eternally present worship in Heaven and re-present (not re-sacrifice) the ONE Perfect Sin Sacrifice. Yes I know that sacrifice happened only once, but we who are still stuck in these sinful bodies and trapped in time with these puny little brains and finite ability to understand need to remind ourselves of the price and feed our souls periodically. Kind of like having sex once was enough to seal the marriage covenant but renewing the covenant is a good idea for healthy marriage. I believe that the reason Protestants consistently accuse Catholics of worshipping things other than Jesus is because they don’t worship Jesus enough. They have been confused with counterfeit forms of worship and are not properly anchored in Jesus. I know that statement will send more than a few readers for their own buckets, but what would you have me to say? That I receive Jesus, physically, actually, Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity and that it doesn’t really make a difference? (Why Holy Communion is not symbolic).

Ok those are my thoughts, now I would like to briefly address Dr. Mizzi’s main point in the post I linked about and his “logical conclusion.” Dr. Mizzi fairly states the Catholic postion and quotes from paragraph 2132 of the CCC:

The Christian veneration of images is not contrary to the first commandment which proscribes idols. Indeed, “the honour rendered to an image passes to its prototype,” and “whoever venerates an image venerates the person portrayed in it.” The honour paid to sacred images is a “respectful veneration,” not the adoration due to God alone: Religious worship is not directed to images in themselves, considered as mere things, but under their distinctive aspect as images leading us on to God incarnate. The movement toward the image does not terminate in it as image, but tends toward that whose image it is.

And then says well if you venerate images of saints then you must be worshipping images of God because that is that is the “logical conclusion”….he says it with more words than that but that’s the general gist. What he is missing is this. The veneration directed toward the image of a Saint is not to the image but the Saint. Just as I might kiss the picture of my husband as I call my husband to my memory (if I was a picture-kisser and I am not) I don’t confuse the picture with my husband and my husband is not going to come home and accuse me of being unfaithful. It is NOT different with an image of Jesus. The image of Jesus might call to mind Jesus Himself and might call me to fruitful prayer and meditation on Jesus….not the image…..as I detailed in this post here. (Statues, Closets and the Council of Carthage) Really and truly. I am not making that up.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 01:51:43 | Permalink | Comments (7)

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Why Do Catholics Worship the Pope? Mary? Statues?

Raise your hand if you haven’t heard a variation of this? Why do you Catholics worship the Pope? Oh look there’s a hand….haven’t been Catholic long have you?  (Sometimes the question isn’t even asked as nicely as that.) My son was asked by a non-Catholic why he worshipped candles. Now he thinks that all non-Catholics think we worship candles. I keep trying to disabuse him of that notion but it keeps coming up anyway.

I think there are two big problems with the perception that people have regarding the respect Catholics have for their leaders. The first is historical. Much of the ceremony associated with church leaders has been passed down to us from an age where EVERYONE got more respect than we customarily give now. It wasn’t even a generation ago when even average people weren’t called my their first names because it was too familiar. If you go back a few more generations you enter an age where leaders were accorded far more physcial gestures of respect than we do today. You bowed to kings. You bowed to nobility. And nobody considered it worship. It was simply a matter of respect. The Catholic church has hung onto these gestures of respect long after most have abandoned them. I don’t think that is necessarily a bad thing.

Second, I have found that part of the problem non-Catholics have with the respect we pay to non-divine entities stems very much from their definition of worship. Protestants tend to define anything that shows up in their morning worship services as worship. Sing a song…worship. Study the Bible…worship. Pray….worship. Worship is what THEY define it to be and so they look at anything Catholics do and say “Well if we did that it would be worship. They do that…therefore it’s worship.” What they don’t understand, what they don’t have, is the Mass which is worship as Jesus defined it. “Do this in remembrance of me.” Because they don’t worship Jesus ENOUGH, they tend to look at Catholics and say that we worship statues, and saints, and whatever, because they have been robbed of TRUE worship they confuse worship and respect.

It wasn’t until I began to worship Jesus as He commanded, as He intended, that I began to be able to discern between worship and respect.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 01:33:02 | Permalink | Comments (5)

Monday, June 11, 2007

Pomp and Circumstance

A remark from that Protestant homeschooling forum…. 

Personally, I really despise all the pomp and circumstance that comes with much of high liturgy religion. The Jesus I read of who hung out with fisherman, tax collectors, and prostitutes was not the guy on earth to wear scarlet robes and a big pointy hat.

Which leaves me to wonder what Jesus hanging out with “fishermen, tax collectors, and prostitutes” has to do with the liturgy and guys in pointy hats? Are they incapable of understanding and appreciating the pomp and circumstance of high liturgy? The history of the Catholic Church as reflected in the individual stories of those who came from those walks of life to the Catholic Church and high liturgy would suggest otherwise. Are they unworthy? I would also disagree with that because we are all equally unworthy.

Although Jesus did hang out with fishermen, tax collectors and prostitutes we frequently see Him in the Temple (and not always in a bad mood either) where there was quite a lot of “pomp and circumstance.” We also see the Lamb of God in heaven (Revelation) with quite a lot of “pomp and circumstance” so it would seem that He is not opposed to it.

I think it is important to note that Catholics believe that there is nothing more or less special about Mass offered in St. Peter’s vs Mass in hut in the Amazon vs Mass in Dachau vs. Mass on an upturned canoe such as Fr. Wojtyla used to offer before he wore the pointy hat. Our Lord deserves the best we know how to offer both from our hearts AND in the physical expression of liturgy. 

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:48 | Permalink | No Comments »

Thursday, May 3, 2007

Kissing Pictures

Saw a question on Yahoo! Answers today while I was taking a break from writing the blog entry I planned to post this evening. So I took a break from writing that one to write this one instead:

Catholic Friends: Kissing and/or bowing [to] an almost naked man nailed on a cross, isn’t idolatry???

Pls see Commandment #2.

No it isn’t idolatry. When my husband is away, I’ve been known to kiss his picture because I miss him. I can’t kiss him, so I kiss his image as a substitute. My husband knows I am not in love with the picture. I may like the picture, but only because it reminds me of my husband. My husband is not jealous of the picture when I kiss it, because he knows that my affection is not truly directed at the picture but at him. Sometimes I weep because I miss my husband and hold his picture in my arms while I sleep. My husband knows all of this and yet, has never once contemplated divorce on the grounds that I have had an emotional affair with his picture.

I long to stand with the faithful disciples at the foot of the cross and comfort Our Lord as He made that sacrifice for us. If I could, I would kiss His feet and and just be with Him and pray for Him. What happened at the cross had to happen so that I could be with Him forever, but all the same I would do what I could to ease the horror. I pray for Him on the cross, now, in this time and this place because I may be limited by time but my prayers are not and God is not and we are supposed to pray for each other. I know that Jesus longed for the Apostle’s prayers, perhaps mine are worth something too. Even so, I would rather be THERE in that moment, in that time, so that I could literally kiss His Feet and wipe the sweat from His brow. but I cannot. Time separates me and He is in heaven and I cannot be there where I long to be and fear to be all at the same time. And so I kiss the crucifix, for the same inexplicable reason I kiss the picture of my husband when I long to be with him but cannot.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 05:10:00 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Sunday, March 4, 2007

In the Quiet of the Church…

My children have their weekly religious education class (well the one they do at church anyway) in the hour between Sunday morning Masses. I have taken to spending this time in the church in prayer before the Tabernacle.

This morning while I was lost in prayer, I happened to look up and witness the most touching scene. The deacon was at the ambo preparing the Sanctuary for Mass when a young woman who is an Extraordinary Minister of the Holy Eucharist walked onto dais and opened the Tabernacle to obtain the Blessed Sacrament to bring to one of the homebound of the parish. The deacon’s attention was drawn by the slight noise behind him and seeing what was happening, he stepped quietly from the ambo and though he must walk with a cane, dropped to his knees in adoration. Totally unaware of the deacon behind her, the young woman finished her errand, genuflected, and slipped out the side door.

I was reminded of Thomas Howard in On Being Catholic:

When a Roman Catholic “goes to church”, he sees himeself as joining himself to something that is already going on. He sets aside both the hurly-burly of his domestic or professional situation and any preoccupation he may have with such patently excellent concerns as fellowship or chat or even a certain vitality in the air. He has been summoned to the unum necessarium. He here takes his place — literally, he believes — with angels and archangels and with all the company of heaven, who incessabili laud and magnify the Holy Name of the Most High, as the Te Deum puts it.

And though I couldn’t see it or hear it, it was as if the door cracked open and heaven was visible. And we knelt in faith and in hope and in anticipation….

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 23:06:07 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, February 5, 2007

He Didn’t Really MEAN That, Did He?

It’s come up again on a forum that I partipate on. How is it that we Roman Catholics can be in “complete denial” and “blindly follow” in believing that the Eucharist is the actual Body and Blood of our Lord? The short answer is, of course, from Sacred Scripture, Faith is the realization of what is hoped for and evidence of things not seen. (Hebrews 11:1) and “Have you come to believe because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and believed.” (John 20:29) I think the words of Jesus to St. Thomas are especially applicable to this since it was a matter of seeing Jesus bodily. As a Catholic I believe that I receive the actual Body and Blood of Jesus which is miraculously made present at the moment of consecration. I do not believe that Jesus is re-sacrificed but rather that I mystically enter into the eternal worship of the Lamb as pictured in Revelation. The One Perfect Holy Sacrifice of Jesus which is eternally present at the altar in heaven (as discussed in Revelation) is made present in the Mass.

While the Eucharist was instituted as a Sacrament at the Last Supper it does little good to parse only the words of the events of the Last Supper without looking at the broader context of Scripture itself. (Please note I am not saying that the account of the Last Supper are not in themselves meaningful and important only that by concentrating on them alone we are perhaps likely to come away with a different meaning that that portrayed by Sacred Scripture as a whole.) Scripturally this is why I believe in the Real Presence in Holy Communion.:

1. It is pre-figured in the OT.

  • In Genesis 14:18 Melchizadek offers bread and wine and prefigures the bread and wine offering instituted by Jesus at the Last Supper. Hebrews 6:20 confirms this connection by describing Jesus as a “high priest for ever after the order of Melchizadek.” (Hebrews 7:1-7 is also helpful)
  • The Passover Lamb was killed and eaten. In perhaps one of the most powerful metaphors for Salvation written by God into the very lives of the Chosen People to secure their deliverance from Egypt (literally a land of death) the Angel of Death passes over the homes with the blood of the lamb on their doorposts. Those without the blood of the lamb on the doorposts lose their firstborn. Here we see that the lamb not only provided blood for the doorposts but nourishment for the journey to the Promised Land.
  • When wandering through the dessert for 40 years God provides manna which sustains them on the journey to the Promised Land. It looks like bread but acts like meat (gets wormy and rots not molds — Exodus 16:20).
  • The Sin Sacrifice in a powerful confirmation of the meaning of the Passover Lamb. It too is killed and eaten.

While the Eucharist was instituted as a Sacrament at the Last Supper it does little good to parse the words of the events of the Last Supper without looking at the broader context of Scripture itself.

2. Jesus set the stage for it before the Last Supper.

Quote:
John 6:30-69 So they said to him, “What sign can you do, that we may see and believe in you? What can you do? 31 Our ancestors ate manna in the desert, as it is written: ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”

I find it interesting that the “Bread of Life” discourse comes right after the people ask him for a sign that they might see and believe. He has just fed 5000 people (prefiguring the multiplication of His Body for the Church in the Eucharist) but they are asking for more. What follows is “the sign” that will help us “see and believe” but at the end of his discourse many LEAVE him and He doesn’t call them back because they misunderstood!

Quote:
32 So Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, it was not Moses who gave the bread from heaven; my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is that which comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” 34 So they said to him, “Sir, give us this bread always.” 35 Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; whoever comes to me will never hunger, and whoever believes in me will never thirst. 36 But I told you that although you have seen (me), you do not believe. 37 Everything that the Father gives me will come to me, and I will not reject anyone who comes to me, 38 because I came down from heaven not to do my own will but the will of the one who sent me. 39 And this is the will of the one who sent me, that I should not lose anything of what he gave me, but that I should raise it (on) the last day. 40 For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I shall raise him (on) the last day.”

41The Jews murmured about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven,” 42 and they said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph? Do we not know his father and mother? Then how can he say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?” 43 Jesus answered and said to them, “Stop murmuring among yourselves. 44 No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draw him, and I will raise him on the last day. 45 It is written in the prophets: ‘They shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who listens to my Father and learns from him comes to me. 46 Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father. 47 Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the desert, but they died; 50 this is the bread that comes down from heaven so that one may eat it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.”

52 The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us (his) flesh to eat?” 53 Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. 54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. 55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. 56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him. 57 Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me. 58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever.” 59 These things he said while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.

60 Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?” 61 Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, “Does this shock you? 62 What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? 63 It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life. 64 But there are some of you who do not believe.” Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him. 65 And he said, “For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father.” 66 As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him. 67 Jesus then said to the Twelve, “Do you also want to leave?” 68 Simon Peter answered him, “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 We have come to believe and are convinced that you are the Holy One of God.”

First Jesus claims the superiority of His Bread over that of the manna given in the wilderness. (Verses 48-50) How can earthly natural bread acting only as a symbol be superior to the miraculous manna provided by the Heavenly Father in the wilderness?

Second, everyone present understood Jesus to be speaking literally of his own body. “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” v 52 and “This saying is hard; who can accept it?” v 60 Many of his disciples who had spent much time with Him. Who spoke the same language as He did, who understood that He often spoke inparable and symbolically and allegorically understood that Jesus meant exactly what He said and LEFT HIM!!

Contrast this to other places in scripture where Jesus corrects and explains what He means when He is misunderstood. For example in John 3:3-5.

Quote:
Jesus answered and said to him, “Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can see the kingdom of God without being born 3 from above.” 4 Nicodemus said to him, “How can a person once grown old be born again? Surely he cannot reenter his mother’s womb and be born again, can he?” 5 Jesus answered, “Amen, amen, I say to you, no one can enter the kingdom of God without being born of water and Spirit.

Nicodemus clearly misunderstands what Jesus meant and Jesus corrects his understanding. He does similarly in John 11:11-14; Matthew 19:24-26; John 8:21-23; John 8:31-36: and John 6:32-35.

When his audience rightly takes him literally, Jesus confirms what He has said and repeats it. For example: Matthew 9:2-6.

Quote:
And there people brought to him a paralytic lying on a stretcher. When Jesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, “Courage, child, your sins are forgiven.” 3 At that, some of the scribes said to themselves, “This man is blaspheming.” 4 Jesus knew what they were thinking, and said, “Why do you harbor evil thoughts? 5 Which is easier, to say, ‘Your sins are forgiven,’ or to say, ‘Rise and walk’? 6 But that you may know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins” –he then said to the paralytic, “Rise, pick up your stretcher, and go home.”

If I may paraphrase…the Scribes say to themselves “Did He just forgive someone’s sins!? That’s Blasphemy!” and Jesus replies “Yep. That’s exactly what I did! And it isn’t blasphemy because I have the authority to do so!”

Another example of Jesus confirming and repeating a literal statements is in John 8:56-59 (and John 6:41-51.)

So in this case where Jesus’ audience is clearly taking Him literally. What does He do. Correct and explain? Or confirm and repeat? Look at verses 53-58 again….

Quote:
53 Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you.

repeats and confirms

Quote:
54 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day.

repeats and confirms

Quote:
55 For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink.

repeats and confirms

Quote:
56 Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him.

repeats and confirms

Quote:
57 Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me.

repeats and confirms

Quote:
58 This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever.”

repeats and confirms

This does not sound like the language of symbolism. His disciples are leaving. The 12 Apostles are shaken so badly Jesus asks them if they are going to leave too; but, Jesus didn’t back away one iota from what is a VERY hard teaching to accept.

And it IS hard. But OT Sacred Scripture is clear. Deliverance from sin involves sacrifice and that sacrifice is eaten. NT Sacred Scripture is also clear Jesus is our Perfect, Spotless, Sin Sacrifice….the Lamb of God. Jesus himself makes sure we don’t miss the connection in the Bread of Life Discourse and in the Institution of the Eucharist when He says “This IS my Body.” and “This IS my blood.” Maybe, just maybe, we could parse our way around the language the accounts of the Last Supper were the only words of Jesus we had regarding this mystery but it isn’t.

Then we have the confirmation in the testimony of the Church as found in the events that happened after the Last Supper.

In 1 Corinthians 10:16 The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ?

1 Corinthians 11: 23-29 23 For I received from the Lord what I also handed on to you, that the Lord Jesus, on the night he was handed over, took bread, 24 and, after he had given thanks, broke it and said, “This is my body that is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” 25 In the same way also the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” 26 For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the death of the Lord until he comes. 27 Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord. 12
28 A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup. 29 For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment 14 on himself.

How can unworthily participating in a symbolic remembrace bring judgment on someone. It’s disrespectful, yes, but making one “answer for the Body and Blood of Our Lord”?

John the Baptist calls Jesus “The Lamb of God” in John 1:29. He is called the Paschal Lamb in 1 Corinthians 5:7 and the symbolism is repeated frequently in Revelation. The Paschal Lamb was to be eaten (Exodus 12:8 and 46)

Beyond the evidence of Sacred Scripture we have the witness of the early church. This witness is important because in a way, it is our first commentray on Sacred Scripture. What the earliest Christians believed and practiced was taught to them by the Apostles themselves and reflect the understanding the Apotles themselves had of what Jesus said. St. Ignatius, a disciple of the Apostle John wrote this in 110 AD:

Quote:
Take not of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God….They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ. Letter to the Smyrnaeans

The Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist was believed and taught in the church from the beginning. Denying the Real Presence was one of the first heresies! The Romans tossed early Christians to the lions for cannibalism…a charge that would have been VERY easy to refute by simply making clear the symbolic nature of the Eucharist but these brave men and women died for what they knew to be the Truth. Jesus is present Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity in the Eucharist.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 00:51:02 | Permalink | Comments (5)

Friday, January 12, 2007

The Eucharist, The Liturgy, and The Early Church: Part 2

So in response to a request that I prove that the early church that was meeting in homes used the Liturgy and took Holy Communion seriously I posted the following:

Once again I find myself in theological waters that I am NOT trained to swim in. If in what follows I have made errors of expression or theology, I would beg my brothers and sisters in the Catholic faith to correct my errors. I would ask that these errors be held against me alone and not the Catholic Church as a whole. I have labored to check my understanding against as many official Catholic teachers/documents (and reference them) as possible. I believe that I have represented Catholic teaching on this subject accurately; however, should I be in error please blame ME and not the Catholic Church.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse View Post
No, definitely not ‘our own ideas.’ I am saying, we respond the best way we know in truth and in spirit. There is much evidence in the early church that the Lord’s Supper was much as protestants celebrate it today…with ‘typical’ food (bread and wine) as opposed to ‘holy’ and special foods (like the shew bread that was used in the Tabernacle.) And by 300 AD or so….we see in historical documents that the RCC began to function much as it does today.

Well I was certainly told that as a Protestant but I have to say after reading primary sources, that the basis for that opinion appears primarily to be mostly what I imagined it to be like and not at all in keeping with the actual historical record. I am certainly open to altering that opinion. Could you point me to some primary sources?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse
But St. Paul did not appear in scripture wearing priestly robes, burning incense or performing the Eucharist as a ceremony. He was a missionary - traveling and preaching and starting new groups of believers.

Well Sacred Scripture doesn’t say that he didn’t use those things but I’m willing to spot you that he didn’t. However, we see them ALL in the worship of heaven pictured in Revelation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse
Regarding Communion, Paul admonished believers (I’d have to look for ref.) who were showing up ready to scarf, without a prepared heart. Protestants (and I am certain RCs are as well!) are encouraged to spend some time preparing for the Lord’s Supper by examining their hearts for unforgiveness, etc. I wouldn’t dream of taking communion without spending time before God making sure I am not angry and harboring unforgiveness. …or in need of another’s forgiveness. To do so is very dangerous according to scripture.

This is the New Covenant church. We are never instructed to follow the old covenant law. We are not Jews. Jews are/were free to continue meeting in the Temple (if the nonbelieving Jews would allow them), but they were not required to do so. The early church consisted of small groups (Acts) meeting in various homes.

Meeting in homes is not necessarily inconsistent with liturgical worship.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse
Everything ABOUT the old covenant rules and regulations and descriptions pointed to Christ (as you know). Now that Christ has come, it is all about HIM - St. Paul called the Law a ’school book’ towards understanding grace.

Exactly. But the same God that prescribed ceremony and ritual, indeed FILLED the lives of ancient Israel with it, didn’t do away with all of that. He transformed it. He made it new! (Revelation 21:5 The one who sat on the throne * said, “Behold, I make all
things new.”
) The Catholic mass is FULL of Christ, beginning to end. I did a very long explanation of the Mass a while back, may I be so bold as to ask you to read it? The Mass is so much more than “a rule book” Jesus didn’t do away with ceremony, He transformed it. Just as the Old Covenant worship prepared the Apostles (and eventually the church) for the Eucharistic celebration of the Church, the Mass prepares us for the final transformation of worship that we see pictured in Revelation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse
In 70 AD, with the destruction of the Temple, that about settled it. Jesus had instructed the believers to flee to the mountains and to go outside of the city. During the attack on the City of Jerusalem, it would have been a very normal reaction to go BACK within the city walls for protection. Any believers who had disobeyed the instructions of Jesus, would have been destroyed with the Jews and others who had gone back into the city. Millions died - it was truly the first Holocaust. We actually have just studied this in our home group, The Last Days According to Jesus, by RC Sproul. We hadn’t realized that millions and millions of Jews died during that attack in 70 AD. It must have been massive. Even the gold in the Temple melted down inbetween the bricks of the foundation.. ..and true to Jesus’ words, every last stone was removed (later) as people retrieved the hardened gold (stolen from God’s Temple, of course.)

So, my point is, the ‘church’ consisted - by the design and instruction of Christ during his last days on earth - of small groups, largely meeting in homes, under ground. Not publicly! This is my understanding.

Before I get to the bulk of my answer I would just like to ask this question (again): Why would meeting in small groups in homes necessarily mean that the early church was not liturgical?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HouseMouse
If you could state ‘the reverse?’ (above,) I’d be happy to get you scripture - I’m not sure exactly what you mean? Are you saying, we are not free to worship God as protestants do - sans the official ‘rules’ of the RCC?

Just consider the book of Acts. Worship there involved meeting together in fellowship, prayer and the meeting of each others needs, supporting the widowed (which included any single woman led family) and orphans, and going out to preach the good news. The Eucharist is not mentioned. Different groups of believers responding separately (to the same Christ) in love and truth, is the norm.

I think it is critical to separate the Church (both RC and protestant components) from Jesus Christ, the Bride Groom, Himself. The church is not perfect - Only Jesus Christ is. We aren’t to follow the church, we ARE the church. We are to follow Jesus.

HTH…

I have to disagree strongly that the Eucharist is not mentioned in Acts. Perhaps the word `Eucharist’ is not mentioned but then neither is the `Trinity’ or other theological words that describe what is understood from a careful reading of Sacred Scripture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acts 2:42-47
42 * They devoted themselves to the teaching of the apostles and to the communal life, to the breaking of the bread and to the prayers. 43 Awe came upon everyone, and many wonders and signs were done through the apostles. 44 All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their property and possessions and divide them among all according to each one’s need. 46 Every day they devoted themselves to meeting together in the temple area and to breaking bread in their homes. They ate their meals with exultation and sincerity of heart, 47 praising God and enjoying favor with all the people. And every day the Lord added to their number those who were being saved.

Verse 42 and 46 both speak of their devotion “to the breaking of the bread.” This in a nutshell is the Eucharistic celebration.

This is why I think so.

First, I believe (and the RCC teaches) that Sacred Scripture from beginning to end is unified. The OT is not done away with by the NT.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catechism of the Catholic Church
122 Indeed, “the economy of the Old Testament was deliberately so oriented that it should prepare for and declare in prophecy the coming of Christ, redeemer of all men.” “Even though they contain matters imperfect and provisional, ” the books of the Old Testament bear witness to the whole divine pedagogy of God’s saving love: these writings “are a storehouse of sublime teaching on God and of sound wisdom on human life, as well as a wonderful treasury of prayers; in them, too, the mystery of our salvation is present in a hidden way.”

123 Christians venerate the Old Testament as true Word of God. The Church has always vigorously opposed the idea of rejecting the Old Testament under the pretext that the New has rendered it void (Marcionism) .

The unity of the Old and New Testaments

128 The Church, as early as apostolic times, and then constantly in her Tradition, has illuminated the unity of the divine plan in the two Testaments through typology, which discerns in God’s works of the Old Covenant prefigurations of what he accomplished in the fullness of time in the person of his incarnate Son.

129 Christians therefore read the Old Testament in the light of Christ crucified and risen. Such typological reading discloses the inexhaustible content of the Old Testament; but it must not make us forget that the Old Testament retains its own intrinsic value as Revelation reaffirmed by our Lord himself. Besides, the New Testament has to be read in the light of the Old. Early Christian catechesis made constant use of the Old Testament. As an old saying put it, the New Testament lies hidden in the Old and the Old Testament is unveiled in the New.

130 Typology indicates the dynamic movement toward the fulfillment of the divine plan when “God [will] be everything to everyone.” Nor do the calling of the patriarchs and the exodus from Egypt, for example, lose their own value in God’s plan, from the mere fact that they were intermediate stages.

emphasis added

When I see the Almighty on the throne in heaven in Revelation 21:5 and hear Him declare “Behold, I make all things new.” I am left with the expectation that just as the Old Covenant was not done away with by the coming of the Messiah but rather was renewed and transformed, so too will the things of this present age come to a perfect fulfillment in the coming Kingdom that is glimpsed in Revelation. Just as the Liturgy is drawn from Sacred Scripture and serves to explain it, there is a similar relationship between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant. I look to the Old Testament/Old Covenant for the prefiguring of what is to come in the New Covenant. It sets the stage and establishes a pattern. It helps to explain what is to come. The New Covenant is understandable ONLY when it is intimately connected to the symbolism, the language and the liturgy of the Old Covenant. Similarly I believe that the perfection of all things as revealed in Revelation is understandable only when it is intimately connected to the symbolism, the ceremony, and the teachings of both Old and New Covenant. The Liturgy of the Eucharist or the Catholic Mass provides the bridge between the symbolism and ceremonies of the Old Covenant and the symbolism and ceremonies depicted in the New Covenant and the perfection of worship in Heaven.

Quote:
In the earthly liturgy we share in a foretaste of that heavenly liturgy which is celebrated in the Holy City of Jerusalem toward which we journey as pilgrims, where Christ is sitting at the right hand of God, Minister of the sanctuary and of the true tabernacle. from the Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy (Vatican II document)

I know that this may seem like a trivial statement but Jesus was a devout Jew. He was steeped in the ceremonies and practices and scriptures of the Jews. His uncle (Zechariah) was a temple priest. His parents were devout and presumably raised Jesus in an atmosphere of Jewish ritual and prayer. Jesus was circumcised on the eighth day (Luke 2:21), presented in the Temple (Luke 2:22), and went annually to Jerusalem for the Passover (Luke 2:41). Jesus was consumed with zeal for His Father’s house. (Luke 20:45; Matthew 21:12; Mark 12:15) Yes at times Jesus spoke against the abuse of ritual and legalism but I see no indication that he tossed out the baby with the bathwater so to speak. For example, He healed on the Sabbath. Then declared that He could do so not because the Sabbath wasn’t to be properly observed, but because He was the Creator of it and was entitled to care for his charges as were the leaders entitled to care for theirs (animals). The apostles were also observant, devout Jews and they all spoke the same ceremonial and cultural language. They understood the Old Covenant patterns that had been laid down. Everything Jesus said and did and taught would be understood within that framework and where God wanted something radically different (i.e. new Christians were not bound to Jewish dietary and circumcision laws) there needed to be significant new teaching by Jesus or Divine intervention to the contrary (like Peter’s vision in Acts 10:9-16).

So when I read the Old Testament what patterns do I see? First, I see that worship was to be sacrificial and that God was very particular about the guidelines given to men. Abel’s sacrifice was accepted and Cain’s was not (Genesis 4:1-7). The theme of sacrifice is repeated in the Passover. The pattern of seriousness in ceremony and observance is repeated and amplified by the numerous instructions and warnings given in Sacred Scripture and evidenced in Jewish culture by the seriousness with which even modern observant Jews approach the Passover. While in the desert, God gives the law and instructions regarding the sacrifices that are expected as acts of worship from His people. And even though the instructions are copious with specific instructions regarding garments, furniture, furniture placement, decorations, construction, etc. there is still much that isn’t written in Sacred Scripture (traditional knowledge….and a parallel to Liturgies) regarding ceremonial procedures and prayers used in the actual Temple rituals. God made it clear that His rules and not man’s personal ideas were to be foremost. [Nadab and Abihu being killed by fire from heaven for offering strange incense is mentioned four times in Leviticus 10:1-2, Numbers 3:2-4a, Numbers 26:60-61, and 1 Chronicles 24:1-2; Saul loses kingship because he failed to wait for Samuel before offering a sacrifice in 1 Samuel 13: 1-13; an additional altar nearly causes civil war in Joshua 22:13-16; and God threatened to kill Moses for failing to circumcise his son in Exodus 4:24-26]

These are the scriptures and the culture and the life that formed the men that met in the Upper Room on the night before Jesus’ crucifixion. These are the men that Jesus specifically commissioned to form and lead His Church. On that evening Jesus, in the middle of an old and ancient and established Jewish Liturgy, takes the ceremony and transforms it in preparation for its fulfillment the following day. He instructs them to prepare for the ceremony (Matthew 26:18-19) and at the outset, He marks this ceremony as something special and different. He says to them “I have eagerly desired to eat this Passover with you before I suffer, for I shall not eat it [again] until there is fulfillment in the kingdom of God.” (Luke 22:15) Then comes the transformation of all of the teaching of Melchizedek, of Passover, of manna, and the sin sacrifice into the Sacrament that would sustain the new Church in the years until the Second Coming just as Manna did in the wilderness for the Jews. It is clear both from Sacred Scripture (I won’t reiterate that part here because I have already done much of it previously in this thread) and from the earliest church writings that these men believed that the Eucharist was the Real Presence of Jesus.

St. Ignatius, a disciple of the Apostle John wrote this in 110 AD:

Quote:
Take not of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God….They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the Flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ. (Letter to the Smyrnaeans )

and

Quote:
“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible” (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).

St. Justin Martyr wrote in 150AD

Quote:
“We call this food Eucharist, and no one else is permitted to partake of it, except one who believes our teaching to be true and who has been washed in the washing which is for the remission of sins and for regeneration [i.e., has received baptism] and is thereby living as Christ enjoined. For not as common bread nor common drink do we receive these; but since Jesus Christ our Savior was made incarnate by the word of God and had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so too, as we have been taught, the food which has been made into the Eucharist by the Eucharistic prayer set down by him, and by the change of which our blood and flesh is nurtured, is both the flesh and the blood of that incarnated Jesus” (First Apology 66).

St. Iraneus wrote in 190 AD

Quote:
“If the Lord were from other than the Father, how could he rightly take bread, which is of the same creation as our own, and confess it to be his body and affirm that the mixture in the cup is his blood?” (Against Heresies 4:33–32 [A.D. 189]).

and

Quote:
“He has declared the cup, a part of creation, to be his own blood, from which he causes our blood to flow; and the bread, a part of creation, he has established as his own body, from which he gives increase unto our bodies. When, therefore, the mixed cup [wine and water] and the baked bread receives the Word of God and becomes the Eucharist, the body of Christ, and from these the substance of our flesh is increased and supported, how can they say that the flesh is not capable of receiving the gift of God, which is eternal life—flesh which is nourished by the body and blood of the Lord, and is in fact a member of him?” (ibid., 5:2).

I won’t belabor this particular point. It isn’t hard to find quotes from the Early Church Fathers to support the universality of the belief in the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist. I have sometimes said that one of the reasons one sees such depth of reverence in Catholic Churches and Orthodox Churches is that we believe that Jesus is really and truly present in the Blessed Sacrament. I do not wish to imply that churches which do not believe and teach this are not reverent but rather that the reverence somehow seems qualitatively different. I say this not of only from my own experience in Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic churches but from what I have been told by many friends in relatives of various faith traditions as being true from their own experiences. Is it logical to believe that these Apostles, so steeped in a culture of ceremony and ritual who clearly taught their students that Jesus, the Lord and Savior, the Perfect Sin Sacrifice was truly and actually present in the Eucharist would then treat it without ceremony and ritual? To believe that even the earliest Eucharistic celebrations were not adaptations of the Liturgy that Jesus used to institute the Sacrament in the first place staggers the imagination! The pattern was set in the Old Testament and reinforced by the culture in which the Apostles lived, learned and taught. There is no teaching or evidence of Divine Revelation to the contrary. Sacred Scripture indicates that the early Church was centered around and took Eucharistic celebrations seriously (they were DEVOTED to the breaking of the bread) and that failure to do so was the equivalent of profaning the Body and Blood of the Lord!! (1 Corinthians 11:27)

Additionally, the Eucharistic Liturgies of the present are themselves prefiguring worship in Heaven as pictured in the Book of Revelation. Now I’d like to take credit for my deep theological study and say that I put this list together myself but I didn’t. Scott Hahn in The Lamb’s Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth discusses in detail how the Revelation is best understood through the Liturgy. He made this list (which I found very interesting) of the parts of your average Catholic Mass and where they are found in the picture of Heaven found in the Book of Revelation.

Sunday worship: Revelation 1:10
A high priest: Revelation 1:13
An altar: Revelation 8:3-4; 11:1; 14:18
Priests (presbyteroi): Revelation 4:4; 11:15; 14:3; 19:4
Vestments: Revelation 1:13; 4:4; 6:11; 7:9; 15:6; 19:13-14
Consecrated celibacy: Revelation 14:4
Lamp stands, or Menorah: Revelation 1:12; 2:5
Penitence: Revelation 2 and 3
Incense: Revelation 5:8; and 8:3-5
The book, or the scroll: Revelation 5:1
The Eucharistic Host: Revelation 2:17
Chalices: Revelation 15:7; ch 16; 21:9
The Sign of the Cross (the tau) Revelation 7:3; 14:1; 22:4
The Gloria: Revelation 15:3-4
The Alleluia: Revelation 19:1, 3, 4, 6
Lift up your hearts: Revelation 11:12
The “Holy, Holy, Holy”: Revelation 4:8
The Amen: Revelation 19:4; 22:21
The “Lamb of God”: Revelation 5:6 and throughout
The Prominence of the Virgin Mary: Revelation 12:1-6; 13-17
Intercession of angels and saints: Revelation 5:8; 6:9-10; 8:3-4
Devotion to St. Michael, archangel: Revelation 12:7
Antiphonal chant: Revelation 4:8-11; 5:9-14; 7:10-12; 18:1-8
Readings from Scripture: Revelation ch 2-3; 5; 8:2-11
The priesthood of the faithful: Revelation 1:6; 20:6
Catholicity or universality: Revelation 7:9
Silent contemplation: Revelation 8:1
The marriage supper of the Lamb: Revelation 19:9, 17

Not only are these things found in the Catholic Liturgy most of them are found and/or prefigured in the Old Testament. Scott Hahn also points out that the Liturgy is not just in the details of Revelation but in the overall scheme as well. The first half of Revelation has an emphasis on readings which closely parallels the first half of the Catholic Mass known as the Liturgy of the Word. The first three chapters form a sort of penitential rite, which Hahn points out, echoes the words of the Didache “First confess your transgressions, that your sacrifice may be pure.” The words of the Revelation itself assumes that it will be read aloud in the liturgical assembly. (Revelation 1:3) The last half of Revelation (beginning in chapter 11) describes the pouring of the seven chalices and the marriage supper of the Lamb which parallels the second half of the Catholic Mass known as the Liturgy of the Eucharist. And notice too, that the Apostle John who many scholars believe was the disciple that reclined on Jesus breast at the Last Supper falls on his face in reverence and worship at the Lamb of God. The same Lamb of God that is present in the Eucharist as the Catholic priest holds up the consecrated host and says:

Quote:
This is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Happy are those who are called to his supper. (Rev. 19:9)

The reverence and seriousness with which we are to approach the Lamb of God in the liturgy of the Eucharist are all modeled for us by the Apostle John himself in the worship shown to us in Revelation. Should we have any expectation that the other Apostles took the “breaking of the bread” as described in Acts and Corinthians any less seriously than the Apostle John did in Revelation?

Worship is established in the Old Covenant, fulfilled in the New; and perfected in Heaven and liturgy is intimately tied into it all at every step along the way. The Old Testament prepared the way both in theology and in the culture that embraced it. The Apostles moved forward to establish the new liturgy and teach its significance and meaning the new church. It is reflected in Sacred Scripture and it shows up early in the historical record as left to us by the ECF’s.

Justin Martyr writing at approximately 150 CE describes the liturgy which already bears a remarkable resemblance to the liturgy as it exists today.

Quote:
Chapter 65. Administration of the sacraments.
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to ãá½³íïéôï [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion.

Chapter 66. Of the Eucharist.
And this food is called among us Åὐ÷áñéóôá½·á [the Eucharist], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, “This do in remembrance of Me, Luke 22:19 this is My body;” and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, “This is My blood;” and gave it to them alone. Which the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For, that bread and a cup of water are placed with certain incantations in the mystic rites of one who is being initiated, you either know or can learn.

Chapter 67. Weekly worship of the Christians.
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead. For He was crucified on the day before that of Saturn (Saturday); and on the day after that of Saturn, which is the day of the Sun, having appeared to His apostles and disciples, He taught them these things, which we have submitted to you also for your consideration.

The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus of Rome (circa 215 AD) also describes early Christian liturgical practices. From the same time period as Hippolytus are other formal liturgies (St James used in the Jerusalem church, St. Mark, and St. Peter) claiming Apostolic lineage.

Taken all together, the unified picture of Sacred Scripture alone leads me to expect to find liturgical worship centered about the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist in the early church. It doesn’t matter if they worshipped in homes, in catacombs, under a tree, or in the wilderness while traveling to a new unreached place; the liturgy was an intimate part of that worship. When you add in the historical record, the picture only becomes clearer and more convincing.

If I may round this out with a few book recommendations?

The Lamb’s Supper: The Mass a Heaven on Earth by Scott Hahn: This is the book to read if you want to learn more about what ancient theologians believed was contained in the Book of Revelation.

The Mass of the Early Christians by Mike Aquilina: This is kind of a dry book but full of good information and a good jumping off point for further historical research about worship in the early church.

God is Near Us: The Eucharist, The Heart of Life by Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger A collection of Pope Benedict XVI’s homilies, letters, and lectures about the Eucharist. It’s full of insight into what Catholics believe about Holy Communion but it is written by a Catholic (get it? The Pope’s Catholic?) for Catholics. He doesn’t spend any time at all explaining the roots of the belief only the upper branches.

The Teachings of the Church Fathers John R. Willis S.J. (ed.) What the Early Church Fathers said about all kinds of things and referenced to the work that they are found in so you can go read it in context if you’d like.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church Don’t let someone tell you what Catholics believe. Read it for yourself. A searchable on-line copy is available here.

The Apostolic Fathers volume I and II from the Loeb Classical Library. It contains both the work in the original language and the translation. Look smart….underline the Greek.

And the Ancient Christian Writers series….multiple volumes.

Also the writing of the Early Church Fathers are widely available on the internet. I have found that Googling a phrase from most quotations will pull up the document itself.

Posted by Red Neck Woman at 18:44:59 | Permalink | Comments (1) »